English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do math problems in different ways and get the answer.When I read physics,chemistry and math books i am getting different sorts of ideas and i reject by arguing that some concepts are wrong given by scientists and i start to give my own idea.i always argue with my teacher in physics classes sometimes she gets angry and she will send me out of the class.My friends say that how are u getting new ideas in science and my teachers don't like me they are quoting me as subnormal and they do not answer my doubts.am i becoming a psyche or am i suffering from paranoia

2007-02-09 01:26:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Psychology

6 answers

It is actually a wonderful thing that you get doubts and different ideas about science and math. It shows an active, curious creative mind. And you don't ever want to lose that.

But you're going about it the wrong way. You see, you embrace and express your ideas INSTEAD of the standard ideas being taught. You question what is being taught, but you don't follow through to learn what is being taught.

You need to do both. Your first priority is to learn what is being taught. Yes, these concepts may be faulty and may be replaced by new science in the future. But you see, this has always been true and always will be. Scientific theories are just that, the best guess based on research. They will always be faulty, fall short of absolute truth. All the great minds learned the text books while at the same time pondering doubts and new ideas. You have to do both.

This is why your teachers see your outbursts as an excuse not to learn and disruptive of class time.

You should be first, an A student. You need to fully grasp what's in the textbooks before you can pick it apart. It is childish to voice doubts about something you don't understand. Master the existing knowledge first.

And pick your moments. The classroom is the worst moment. After class in private meetings is far better to discuss the nuances of theory. Otherwise you waste the other students' time, which is limited. You'll be branded as a troublemaker, which it seems has already happened.

You need to be smarter about picking your oopportunities to discuss your ideas. Then you're teachers will respect what you say, because you'll know what you're talking about.

2007-02-09 01:44:17 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

When we name something that did not thitherto have name or form, we create something that was not there before.

In the same chord, when one include the subjective "I" or "me" with a statement they are making the choice to subject themselves with the object being addressed. One might ask, "do I put the word "I" into simple observations or questions by habit?"

These kinds of patterns are examples of linguistic rabbit holes, short cuts to dilution, to disconeasea (separation from ease) of the mind.

Your question left unstated whether your inquiries were well founded, or stumbling upon genius. I take this to indicate that you have not further pursued your feelings. This alone is not healthy practice. Anyone does well to ask, "does my hesitation from or reaction to my own feelings lead me to places I enjoy?"

Much of the mental habits we acquire from other people's pacing, time given for between breaths, thought before speech, visualization before action, are all unique as fingerprints. A single person in a crowd can find it easy to forget that every single person operates at a different PACE. The other thing to remember is that every train is heading somewhere different, so before you abandon ship, ask yourself: "would he or she perhaps like to hop onto my train?"

2007-02-09 01:55:05 · answer #2 · answered by downtheupslide 1 · 0 0

Many true, and successful scientists were known for being unique and a little quacky at times, but nevertheless, very much more than intelligent, and perhaps geniuses. I think you have a gift and you should always stand up for what you believe in.

2007-02-09 02:27:20 · answer #3 · answered by MOON13 3 · 0 0

Sounds like you are just thinking "outside the box" to me. Perhaps you are just on a higher plain of existence than most in your area, and they have no clue as to what the heck you are talking about and this is their way of dealing with you. Just because your teacher does not understand what you are trying to tell her does not mean that you are wrong, but rather she just can't grasp what you are meaning.

2007-02-09 01:36:55 · answer #4 · answered by dragondave187 4 · 1 0

I answer first, and if the answering makes me think of or makes my day, then i will movie star. i be attentive to...that is choosy of me, sorry. o.o yet this form I finally end up pointing my followers and contacts to the *great things* you be attentive to? ^__^ Or a minimum of i attempt to. yet have a movie star besides purely for being affected person and records. ^_^

2016-11-02 23:36:36 · answer #5 · answered by bonanno 4 · 0 0

both!!!am jocking!Sometimes it happens to me also....You are probably very special person who suffer from high-self opinion!Don't worry,all scientists were little bit crazy and at first nobody believes in their ideas!Maybe you will be our next great scientist!!!

2007-02-09 01:49:15 · answer #6 · answered by HPA 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers