Democracry has been marked as champion of people's aspirations. A system that has been inuse for centuries in come cultures. But is it the right time to think about a NEW democracy, a democracy beyond borders and cultural interests? Is it the right time to start thinking of a Unified world order?
2007-02-09 00:08:30 · 5 answers · asked by m j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The USA is working on that by trying to implement a Democracy in the Middle East. History has shown us the Democracies do not attack each other. If we can establish Democracy in the Middle East we may be able to establish peace.
2007-02-09 00:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you're saying does not make sense because democracy has at its heart freedom of choice so it is ridiculous to force people to be democratic which you would have to do for your New World Order. Perhaps America is trying to do this now but they will fail a) because American society is based on selfishness and there are too many people who will abuse the system and b) because there is no true democracy in America with only 2 parties.
Democracy was created for Greek city states which were small enough for democracy in something like a real sense. With the large nations we have today it is just nonsense really. However, there doesn't seem to be anything better so I guess we're stuck with phony democracy now just don't try and impose it on the World or we will end up with one massive one World police state which is where we are headed with the US in charge...
2007-02-09 08:31:56 · answer #2 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If you mean "freedom" where you use the word "democracy" I say everyone ought to be free, whether there are borders of countries or not.
Democracy in it's truest sense would amount to chaos. The term means rule by the people. Everyone gets to vote on everything. In a true democracy, the people can vote for the death penalty on Monday, change their minds and vote to abolish the death penalty by the next Monday.
In the US we have a representative republic and basic freedoms. We should strive to see to it that all countries have the same, regardless of their form of government.
2007-02-09 08:24:27 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unified world order indirectly implies that there needs to be a single world leader which would not be acceptable to any country..
please dont even think of ideas that would give rise to any more wars.. already the existing ones are too disastrous
2007-02-09 09:50:42 · answer #4 · answered by angel 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not until the corruption in the governments, the dictatorial thugs, and the militant islamists are all eliminated. The US will never join such an orginzation because it will curtail our freedoms. Above all other things, we value our freedoms.
2007-02-09 08:38:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋