Do you get angry when you see theses "scientists" talk about this "carbon dating" thing they made up? G-d said the devil comes in many forms, I think He is testing us by creating sleasy convincing scientists to lead us astray from The Lord.
2007-02-08 23:26:54 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
He made all the particles of the universe long time ago, just put it together when the time came. Thats like gathering ingredients to bake a cake, then serving it. Then someone carbon dates it and says its a lot older then it is just so they can have an argument that it's not fresh :)
2007-02-08 23:31:11 · answer #1 · answered by be my Angel :) 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Russian Mathematicians like Dr David Atway Ray have demonstrated mathematically that the Earth is only 6 to 10 thousand years. A lot of scientiest who have bought into the evolution myth can not stand this kind of truth.
I personally believe you can demonstrate from the Bible that the Earth is either 6 - 10 thousand years old or approximately 15 Billion years old. Dr Gerald Schroeder formerly from MIT now from Jerusalem U. writes about the math in his books.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-02-09 07:41:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I get angry when I see people saying that the earth is 6000 years old with no true evidence. You can not be a true scientist if you have preconceived ideas and twist the evidence to support that. I am trying very hard to be kind and not mention the level of your intelligence by pointing out spelling and grammatical errors. Does your "faith" preclude you from using spell check?
2007-02-09 07:31:14 · answer #3 · answered by sngcanary 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Carbon dating is only accurate upto about 6000 years. You're talking about radiometric dating as a whole, not just carbon14.
So yeah, why would mainstream geologists use "made up" techniques in their work? Wouldn't that be kind of pointless? The majority of them don't even make their results publicly known so it's not like they are convincing anyone of anything.
2007-02-09 07:31:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Recently I read the book, It’s a Young World After All, by Paul Ackerman. I was very surprised and delighted to find evidence that the speed of light is actually SLOWING DOWN! Barry Setterfield discovered that, “at some point a little beyond 4000 B.C., the curve approaches infinite light speed and thus the ultimate origin.” I would HIGHLY recommend this book. Also I would recommend looking at this web page:
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/rapid-layers-mt-st-helens-chart.gif
The point is this: The new lava dome (dacite) from the at Mount St. Helens was formed in 1986. In 1997 five specimens were taken from this dome at five different locations and subjected to conventional Potassium-Argon dating. The results indicated ages of less than one half to almost three million years old, all from eleven year old rock.
Carbon 14 dating is unreliable at best.
“Here is a remarkable example of C14 difficulties in a book published by Stanford University Press. Six C14 ages were determined from a core in an attempt to date the formation of the Bering Land Bridge. The dates ranged from 4390 to 15,500 Before Present.” -Velikovsky, 1955
I get so tired of people saying that dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago and man came onto the scene about 4 million years ago. Here is a photo of dinosaur foot prints along with human footprints.
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/taylor-all-14.jpg
Don’t tell me the prints were CARVED either!
A cross section of one of the human foot prints was cross sectioned to see if the underlying material was disturbed or not, ultimately telling us for sure whether or not the tracks were carved.
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/burdick-track-being-sectioned-saw.jpg
This view of the resulting cross-section at the heel shows subsurface disturbance directly under and conforming to the shape of the heel impression. This track was not carved.
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/burdick-cross-section-heel.jpg
NOVA TV Special, God, Darwin And The Dinosaurs, "...dinosaur footprints, side by side with humans. Finding them would counter evidence that humans evolved long after the dinosaurs became extinct and back up...[the] claim that all species, including man, were created at one time."
The Earth is not millions or billions of years old. It is THOUSANDS of years old. There is a HUGE amount of evidence that support this if you look for it and actually want to see it. Instead too many people turn a blind eye to the truth.
I would highly recommend watching the downloadable videos on these web pages.
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/videos-quotes.htm
http://www.drdino.com/downloads.php
2007-02-09 08:58:16 · answer #5 · answered by Bags 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's obvious you missed the golden opportunity provided by this great country - the opportunity to obtain an education. It's still not too late to correct that oversight Why don't you give it a try?
2007-02-09 07:31:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't worry, no one can lead anyone astray, if they don't want to.
2007-02-09 07:30:00 · answer #7 · answered by wizard of the East 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which asylem are you from? Let me know and I will get them to come and pick you up.
2007-02-09 07:47:26 · answer #8 · answered by McQ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LMAO!!!!ROTF!!!! You really are a perfect example of "ignorance is bliss".Tell me what's the diff between you and a muslim extremist? NONE!!!
2007-02-09 07:31:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NNNNNNNNooooooooooooooo it is 10000000000000000years old.Now u got that
2007-02-09 07:31:41 · answer #10 · answered by Rehan 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋