All they want is big headlines, they don't care how much blood is shed in the process.
2007-02-08 22:33:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
definite it does difficulty me. i'm happy you introduced some interest to this situation. In concept, i discover it deplorable. yet from a real looking attitude, i'm no longer so adamant. i think there's a definite proportion of people who derive some income; many that does no longer be as probably to get help without the inducement of a speedy restoration and a remarkable treatment. they in many circumstances, a minimum of initially, don't experience in a position or stable adequate to have interaction in something as strenuous as scientific care. for many people who're feeling somewhat distressed and vulnerable, it offsets their tendency to socially isolate themselves- which may make their issues worse. whether you think interior the "treatment" or no longer, it factors a shape for extra efficient action. William James as quickly as mentioned, there is not any longer something as functional as a concept". and many Christians inspite of great non secular zeal, see the fee of psychotherapy and psychotropic medicine and could motivate those interventions alongside with faith. maximum clinicians might additionally agree that a multidimensional, systemic attitude supplies the main suitable outcomes. regrettably, that is been my adventure that those kinds of scientific interactions are no longer enthusiastically inspired via the persons that hotel to enjoying on ones vulnerabilities (e.g. thoughts of loneliness) for the familiar objective of gaining converts. that is not any longer purely Christians. very almost each and every cult has some brainwashing technique consistent with a minimum of initially offering friendship and a feeling of belonging. It provides a layer of trouble than can discourage many from searching for out the main appropriate help they choose on occasion ensuing in significant tragedy. So, i'm no longer all that upset with your ingenious "magic marker" intervention. As I examine that I had yet another concept: does no longer or no longer that is great if such posters, "merchandising a treatment", might require the assertion "....those statements have not been evaluated via the FDA".
2016-11-02 23:28:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they don't. As long as they get the big money for that one story it can be happy or sad, kind or vicious, build them up and tear them down - all in a days work. Life in the gutter I guess, live off whatever comes your way.
2007-02-08 22:46:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Flossie 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
They are in the business of selling papers - if destroying peoples lives sells papers they will do it. Blame the people who like to read this trash.
2007-02-08 22:38:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
We all hate our jobs, people are always going to do it so whether they like it or not is irrelevant, its not their fault, if the public didn't want the gossip they wouldn't take them in the first place.
2007-02-08 22:35:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by agius1520 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
As long as people actually buy these papers, they will continue to fill them with the rubbish you so accurately describe. It's the old conundrum; which came first, the supply or the demand?
2007-02-08 22:35:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Roxy 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
ah today's news is tomorrows chip paper..
those who live by the sword..
only one solution don't buy the sun or the news of the world..
2007-02-08 22:37:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by lion of judah 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
no they dont why do you think they have to give dvds and cds away in their papers when they do i buy the paper have the dvd and chuck the paper in the bin
2007-02-08 22:52:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by welshwalesdragon 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
NOPE
It is all about the bottom line.
They learn a lot from the Clintons.
2007-02-08 23:13:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I agree if they had a conscience they would not be in the job.
2007-02-08 22:50:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ollie 7
·
1⤊
2⤋