I know that the women aren't actually doing the killing themselves, but if they 1), cheer their men on, 2) believe in the war & the reason for fighting in the same way their men do, or 3) teach their children to become like their fathers & grow up to help fight in wars for their countries, are these women then any better than the men who does the fighting? Are these women as innocent & as pure as many women of feminism presents them to be?
I think when men throughout time fought in wars, the majority of women weren't at homes preaching to each other how evil men are for fighting. Many women were the wives, mothers, daughters, & sisters of these men who cheered them on. How are these women any better? It's similar to a killer who goes & kills, & the friend who continuously instigates, provoke, & cheers on the killing. The killer is bad for doing the killing, but the other person instigating is by no means innocent. So then why does feminism only see the men as bad in with war?
2007-02-08
21:15:44
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
TeenTitan: I was talking about the women and men who do behave this way. I am glad to see a woman like yourself who actually feels that men aren't solely the cause of the worlds problems, and taht you feel we are partners here to help each other.
Out of the sea of ignorance, I wish more women were as opened minded as you with what you said.
2007-02-09
03:38:02 ·
update #1