I have no problems with a woman running for president,but cant we find somone a little more upstanding than her to be the first female candidate.
Look at what an honerable honest man her husband turned out to be,he doesnt even know if he has had sex or not,what a moron,and she married him.
2007-02-08 20:17:45 · 31 answers · asked by dan 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I would not vote to make her dog catcher, much less President. Bill and Hillary have always been partners in crime. They know to much on each other, I would not be surprised if one or the other did not end up like Ann Nicole, and very suddenly like she did. You can also bet that who ever survives, is the guilty one. Both together covered their corruption since they married, have had to stick together, one does not trust the other. They both are not only morons , but criminals.
2007-02-08 20:32:48 · answer #1 · answered by m c 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree that Hillary Clinton isn't the Presidential candidate of choice this time. Frankly I hope to see Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, on the Ballot. He has all the qualifications and experience to deal efficiently with foreign matters.
I look for a leader who speaks diplomatically with World leaders on all matters. Our President is our "face on our country". The President represents all of us. This position allows the rest of the world to either admire the United States or not. Co-operation from other countries depend largely on their respect for us.
This is another area where Richardson shines. He has proven himself as a leader in affecting positive results with enviornment.
2007-02-09 01:13:06 · answer #2 · answered by marian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Hillary gets the Democratic nomination for president and runs she will get votes...no doubt about it. Will she win or not is another matter. I am not enthralled with Hillary because she is a bit too crafty for me to stomach. She flip-flops depending on which way the wind is blowing and in my opinion this is dishonest even though many politicians do the same thing. Furthermore, I do not believe that Hillary is smart enough to be president of the USA even with her husband coaching her. I will definitely not vote for her. If a Republican that I do not care for runs then I will not vote. I would vote for Giuliani because he is a tough, honest man. I would also vote for Newt Gingridge.
2007-02-08 20:26:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nothing wrong with her left-of-center views, and nothing wrong with her being a woman. Nor could I care less if the husband was less than truthful.
But she has always given me the impression of a person solely motivated by personal ambition, ready to sacrifice anything in the pursuit of power.
For me, that's not good enough - and I'd like to see a return to a more principled take on the affairs of the world.
2007-02-08 20:37:12 · answer #4 · answered by Vivagaribaldi 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Her husband also became President of the United States of America and what is your latest achievement? If that is all you remember about the Clinton administration then you must better stick that head back in the ground and we'll call you when its all over....By the way...I am going to vote for Mrs. Clinton. Any one remember Margaret Thatcher of Britain? She was a strong powerful leader and Mrs. Clinton reminds me of her. I don't believe they ever laughed at Mrs.Thatcher twice.
2007-02-08 20:30:59 · answer #5 · answered by monkey12 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You are a moron. No one should care who our president sleeps with, as long long as they run the **** out of this country. Rock on Hillary!!! If you are half the president your husband was you will be great.
2007-02-09 03:16:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Really. everyone knows what Bill did, but regardless he was a GREAT president. He did great things economically. The only reason people think she wouldn't do good is because of the whole sex scandal thing. That's what people think of whenever they hear her name. Not how smart or clever she is. Of course he had sex. Who said he didnt? No one. And obviously she married him before all of this happened. So really, you cant blame her.
2007-02-09 02:21:55 · answer #7 · answered by victory_smiles248 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, that would be a no, please. The US is treading on thin ice with everyone right now. She would not be taken seriously by the male leaders of Russia, who by the way, is building a brand, spanking new arsenal of nuke weapons...and Iran would laugh, the Saudis would barf and China would pop one off at the US just to say they could. Nah...has to be a very strong male presence. This is no time for a woman...not yet.
2007-02-08 20:24:02 · answer #8 · answered by chole_24 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would, if I were an American. Of course her husband had sex, who cares, he was a great president. Oh yes, the American so called "moral majority" is more interested in the personal life of the president than in how he does his job... sad
2007-02-08 20:28:13 · answer #9 · answered by Steven Z 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely. Give her a break. I don't agree with what her husband did. He made some big mistakes. Husbands are doing this everywhere but Presidents shouldn't be.
We need to elect someone we can look up to.
2007-02-08 20:28:20 · answer #10 · answered by grandma snacks 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋