First off, you should get rid of the words Islamic Countries. By doing so, I get the impression your muslim, and probably just trying to get sympathy out of other people, and make it look like it's an attack on the Religion of Islam. (Personally, I think every world religion should be abolished, so many people getting brainwashed and starting fights because of them, or in some cases, blowing themselves up).
I think religion was an ok tool for keeping people in line, by invoking fear in the people, that if they didn't behave, there was a place, so horrible, that nothing in this world could compare, or being reborn into an animal or something another.
I don't live in the US, and quite honestly, don't agree with Bush and wish he was dead. Also, if you look at all the countries he's starting fights with, or already is in word fights with, they are not all "ISLAMIC COUNTRIES". Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, etc.. Why don't we all start saying is this an attack on Christianity, and that all Christians, also need to declare some childish holy war on the rest of the world.
Do I agree with what bush is doing in the international scene? No.
Second, I personally think that had the US not invaded some of those countries, somebody else would have attempted, and it probably be some other "Islamic Country" declaring a "Jihad" just to drum up support among other "Islamic Countries". Just like in Iraq, Muslims killing Muslims. Shites Vs. Sunnis. Thats like Roman Catholic in North America blowing up the Churches/Place of Worship (or whatever they may be called for that matter) of Mormans, or Jehovah Witnesses. Any religion that goes talking about peace and love, but goes around hurting and killing people of the same faith, needs to be abolished. Lot's of the people believing in the same god (which wouldn't be surprising if in the end, there is none, and all that religion is, is a waste of time.), but killing each other because their "Religion" says, "This religion is the right one, and every other religion is wrong, and their gods are fake".
2007-02-08 19:57:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by PsyChoPath 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No it is not. Instead of an act of national revenge against those who are said to have organized the attack on the United States on 9/11, BushOilCo has ignored them and made a play for control of the Persian Gulf and Afghanistan instead, at a monumental cost to both those countries and nearly bankrupting the US at the same time. Now they threaten Iran, the "last man standing" in their plan. This is one of the greatest acts of Hubris in recent times, it has already made a horrendous mess in the region and damaged US respect around the world. If they go after Iran, as they seem to indicate they will, it could set off WW III. For them, this plan, concocted in the late 90's at the PNAC, is the right thing to do. For the Islamic world, and all the rest of us who look on in horror at this horrible spectacle of plunder and death, this is a shameful expression of the philosophy that believes if you can do it you should, no matter the consequences. This needs to stop now, before it gets any worse, be cleaned up as best as possible, and the US needs to get out of the oil domination business.
2007-02-09 06:16:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush's only wish is to create economic slavery. He wants to subjugate countries possessing oil wealth. Islamic countries are themselves responsible for such a situation. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan etc. work as American Agents.
2007-02-09 08:18:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by hanvis 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know. I sure wouldn't want to be the President. He has to make some tough decisions based on the facts that he gets.
I would hope that he has the best people to give him the correct facts (I guess he didn't).
I think we expect perfection and if we don't get it, then we complain. I think this would happen with anyone we elect, unfortunately.
I also think it is our duty to elect an intelligent person, someone who understands the problems and has solutions that makes sense. I also think republicans, democrats, independents, etc., should work together to come up with the best solutions instead of bickering about everything. They should call in the smartest people in the US to help them, people who are skilled at brainstorming, planning, etc.
2007-02-09 03:50:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by grandma snacks 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
What is wrong in it. Someone has to control the arrogant Islamic Terrorists. See the Iran's behaviour? They don't listen to anyone. Using the religion's name to get support for their activities. Taliban, Al Qaida, Hamas, Hisbollah, Abu Hamas, Lashkare Toiba and ..who are they? What they are doing? Where they are supported?
2007-02-09 14:15:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Expression 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mr. Bush is correct in attacking Iraq, Afghanistan and other Islamic countries because he is destroying where terrorists train and build-up their violent plans.
2007-02-09 04:29:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
It is not incorrect only , but its great crimes to kill innocent people in Iraq,Afghanistan and other Islamic countries to destroy Islam and serve the Zionism.
2007-02-09 05:06:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
what bush is doing helps not in curbing terrorisms but in spreading hatred among people. he is trying to prove american dominancy in the world
2007-02-10 00:22:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by ranganath m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
YUP!!!!! He should also pull out our troops from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Why are we there? OIL!
2007-02-09 19:13:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No he should concentrate to his own country
2007-02-10 01:07:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by manoz kakkar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋