Was creation of universe an accident ?

Answer 1

the creation of the universe was not an accident. the random movements of energy creating minor particles. given enough time these particles would eventually collide at some point even if it took forever they would eventually have to collide, which would then eventually cause the big bang

Answer 2

If it was accident then the accident has proved to be greatly generative and planned. There are various theories of creation/formation of universe from mythological to religious to scientific. U can term big bang as an accident.

By extrapolating expansion back in time, one approaches a gravitational singularity where everything in the universe was compressed into an infinitesimal point; an abstract mathematical concept that may or may not correspond to reality. This idea gave rise to the Big Bang theory, the dominant model in cosmology today.

During the earliest era of the big bang, the universe is believed to have formed a hot, dense plasma. As expansion proceeded, the temperature steadily dropped until a point was reached when atoms could form. At about this time the background energy (in the form of photons) became decoupled from the matter, and was free to travel through space. The left-over energy continued to cool as the universe expanded, and today it forms the cosmic microwave background radiation. This background radiation is remarkably uniform in all directions, which cosmologists have attempted to explain by an early period of inflationary expansion following the Big Bang.

Origin beliefs are mytho-religious stories which typically explain the beginnings of the universe as a deliberate act of "creation" by a supreme being.

The term creation myth is sometimes used in a derogatory way to describe stories which are still believed today, as the term myth may suggest something which is absurd or fictional. While these beliefs and stories need not be a literal account of actual events, they may yet express ideas that are perceived by some people and cultures to be truths at a deeper or more symbolic level. Author Daniel Quinn notes that in this sense creation myths need not be religious in nature, and they have secular analogues in modern cultures.

Many accounts of creation share broadly similar themes. Common motifs include the fractionation of the things of the world from a primordial chaos (demiurge); the separation of the mother and father gods; land emerging from an infinite and timeless ocean; and so on.

Creation myths generally have nine elements throughout the story:[citation needed]

Birth: where the first person or deity came from.
Mother/Father: who the father god and mother goddess. For example, the Greek creation myth has Gaia as the mother goddess, and Uranus as the father god.
Genealogy: who was the parent of whom
Active/Passive creation: how everything was created. If it was active creation, then there was a creator. Passive creation is when something is just created. Therefore, Gaia is the active creator and Uranus the passive creator.
Supreme Being: the most powerful god. For Babylonians, this was Marduk.
Realm: the home of the gods.
Sin/suffering: explains why bad things happen.
Destruction: how the earth will end. The Norse account calls this "Ragnarök", saying it happens after the death of Balder.[citation needed]
Some religious groups assert that their accounts of creation should be considered alongside, supersede, or even replace scientific accounts of the development of life and the cosmos. This assertion has proven highly controversial

Answer 3

Actually there are Two theories on origin of universe with various models for universe
1) The big bang Theory of lamartieare- which says origin of universe is from a singularity Ie before this there was no space, no time, no matter all were from Zero. and if we accept this theory then there requires one creator at the o point of the singularity and that is the supermost intellegent design- A dice playing god and universe was purposeless or purposefull creation
Another theory is Steady state theory of Bondi, Hoyel Where it is said that universe was not created at all it was be, it will be, there was no big bang, no big Crunch, It was It is it will
Another theory is Quasi Steady State theory of Bondi, hoyel & NarleiekarJB
Another theory is M Theory or theory of Every thing where it support Big bang Theory
Another theory is Electrical Multiverse universe theory- Many universe like Soap bubles
Nither of these theories says it is an accident however

Answer 4

I recommend reading a Briefer History of Time, by Stephen Hawking. It contains some of the latest scientific findings, and illustrates some great points on creation and what some of the most intelligent minds understood, and are understanding about science in relation to creation. This Is not the topic of the book however, as It Is mostly physics for laymen so to speak, but I thought I would bring It up. Personally, I think that everything Is structured, and adheres to certain laws that were intelligently designed by a higher power.

Answer 5

No, I do not believe that it was. It was a purposed event for reasons as yet not fully known. The humanistic view of chance is really not supportable because it can only predict that all life and matter have always been. That is a terribly flimsy basis for any theory, yet they tend to scoff at the idea of a creation based on intelligent design as being impossible. If so, then what evidence can be brought forward to explain the creation aside from a flimsy hypothesis? It is easier to believe intelligent design by an intelligence able to create from nothing than to believe that everything just has been because someone wants to believe that. Without intelligent design, then what designed the base material, or energy from which all has come, other than "it just was" which is not a rational answer.

Answer 6

Accident like the discovery of penicillin, which I highly recommend, or an astronaut's diaper accident while driving to Florida. Depends on your life and experiences. I would put the creation of the universe into the category of the former not the latter.

Answer 7

Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===== ========
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================
http://www.socratus.com

Answer 8

weather you believe in divine creation, or the big bang theory, or some story of mythology, or you think we live in some kids science experiment in a universe so large we have no perception of it. there is no way it was an accident. to imply it was an accident is to suggest that there was a plan and what happened wasn't it.

Answer 9

Scientist and evolutionist want us to believe this but the creationist differ. They feel it is a deliberate work of God. Both do not have sufficient evidence to prove their point. Like always, maybe a central path exists, between the two extreme views, which may be correct.

Answer 10

An event that had no supervisor. Is that the same as an accident though?