English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Yeah we are following a destructive path, the very same path in many third world countries.
Justifying the breakdown of civil liberties for " National Security".Zionist neocons can't hide their oppressive totalitarian agenda.

2007-02-08 18:40:06 · answer #1 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 2 4

THE NECESSARY LAW FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Dominated by a powerful and natural instinct of survival, the human being has been transported through the pass of time toward his multiplication, to be able occupy completely some day our big and extensive planet. Two thosand and five hundred years ago, the Roman patricians promulgated the first shelter law (or guardianship) still today effective which, invites at the parents to give dress, bed and food at the minors age. With it, many minors could obtain the necessary condition, to be able to stop the activities that often being smalls they were forced.
Unfortunately for we, imagine the effects of a permanent or continuous shelter for the people who wish it, has been until today and impossible issue. Now, our first mision is recognize that, with it, we can obtain many benefits. First, the necessary apparatus to safeguard in a natural way, our demographic levels for the future coming. In second place, with this simple law, fredom source and basic for many citizens – we also could get the necessary condition to put the point and end to the social disorders and sufferings like wars, prostitution, the poverty, the illness, the hunger, drugs, delinquency, crimes, emigration...
And finally, like third point with a more just and human shelter, besides obtaining the fruits of freedom, we will obtain the natural apparatus to safeguard and control ours planetarious levels of contamination and degradation due our due to our old and altruistic system of consumption for the future coming.
The reform of this law is an exercise that we must realize between all as rapidly as possible to avoid the appearance of the new evils.

JOSEP CAMPS
SPAIN
After reflect about this, help me to show this page at the people
http://www.leypaz.com
thank you.

2007-02-09 08:24:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This means what? Believe it or not, the congress has never told the truth, so why start now? Liberal Bias?...I think there's plenty more to see, on that score. Now that they're a majority by 3 seats they'll take every issue and debate it until the next liberal gets into office so he/she can take credit for any good it would do.

2007-02-08 18:45:03 · answer #3 · answered by chole_24 5 · 1 2

The Liberals don't KNOW what the truth is, so maybe what you see as a ban is just the right trying not to talk over the libs heads.

2007-02-08 20:02:59 · answer #4 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 1 1

Yeah. I notice that it's always the Republicans who are attempting to pass bans on particular forms of speech and limiting who can say or do what and establish government regulations on what you can say, eat, or do.

Just like it was the Republicans who supported slavery.
Just like it was the Republicans who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Just like the Republicans have a Senator who is a former Grand Klegal of the Klu Klux Klan.
Just like the Repbulicans keep trying to reintroduce the Draft.

Oh...wait...all those things were done by the Democrats.

Orion

2007-02-08 18:44:42 · answer #5 · answered by Orion 5 · 4 3

It's like a tedious argument of insidious intent, to lead us to an overwhelming question (great handle).

That said--I definitely do want to see the debate take place.

2007-02-08 18:48:27 · answer #6 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 1 0

the truth? what is the truth? how do U define it?!
reality is the liberal left winger agenda is an anti US agenda and aimed at making this a socialist nation

2007-02-08 19:09:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Sounds like another silly rumor started by the lunatic left fringe.

2007-02-08 18:48:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Is this the premise of the follow up to your "love song?" P.S. shouldn't you be dead by now?

2007-02-08 18:46:22 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremy B 2 · 2 0

What an odd thing to say. Are you in your right mind?

2007-02-08 18:37:44 · answer #10 · answered by Jace 4 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers