English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the world agreed on a one world government and you could nominate the supreme ruler, what well known person would you nominate?

2007-02-08 18:14:39 · 15 answers · asked by Bud#21 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Her Britannic Majesty the Queen! for two simple reasons, first the power would not go to her head and second Britain is the only country that has any experience in ruling the world.

kby, proud Scot and a very proud Brit!

2007-02-08 18:54:32 · answer #1 · answered by kennyboy 6 · 0 2

I guess Bush was trying that for awhile until he noticed his economy couldn't fund that kind of worldwide attack.

In all seriousness though, the world would fall into chaos with only one ruler, no matter what the government was; democracy, communism, fascism, etc. Democracy would lead to total disagreement between governors or senators or whatever we'd elect under the supreme ruler, and Fascism/Communism would lead to the general public rising against the military, and that could cause serious problems.

2007-02-08 19:10:38 · answer #2 · answered by Wintersnight 3 · 1 1

Wohhhaa, hold it there kiddo. Why in the &ell would we want a one world government? NO WAY!! No supreme rulers. The world could never agree on just one person to rule and I for one would NOT want that.....no...thanks, but NOoooo.

2007-02-08 18:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by chole_24 5 · 1 1

This is being tried by the American's...world domination and all that....but if I had to choose then it would be bob the builder!!

2007-02-08 18:19:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Could it be..... SATAN?

Hey Strattz... I'm the one that gave you the thumbs down, because I'm just not qualified for the job. Besides, you'd hate me. Have you read my response to what I'd do if I could replace Bush? I'd screw things up real well! But I'd do it with the best of intentions! :-)

2007-02-08 18:17:11 · answer #5 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 2 2

Bozo the Clown.

2007-02-08 18:16:26 · answer #6 · answered by brewbeer212 4 · 4 1

I think there is no one that would be qualified...and who would want that responsibility? Someone with any common sense, I mean.

2007-02-09 03:08:32 · answer #7 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0 1

Just as long as India quits ******* with us I don't care who runs the world.

2007-02-08 18:36:38 · answer #8 · answered by Jace 4 · 0 2

I would nominate um......myself. For two cardinal reasons: 1. Im not George W Bush. and 2. Im not Satan. There you have it folks, I'm not evil, Im just an asshole.

2007-02-08 18:19:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

That is totaly unacceptable, too much power for 1 person to have!!!!!!! NO-ONE

2007-02-08 18:37:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers