Both receivers are controversial.
2007-02-08 18:02:17 · 17 answers · asked by Ultimate Fighter 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
You have to ask yourself....Do I want a player who is very unmotivated and only plays when he wants too?...or Do I want to constantly answer questions and be criticized about a player who is always causing controversy?......I know no one likes T.O. and I dont' either but T.O. complains about the dollars and the TV exposure, but he always goes out and wants to be the star player, doesnt' take a play off and if you threw him the ball 50 times he would probably catch 40 of them. With Randy Moss you never know what your going to get, he has tremondous talent but he really only gives max effort when he doesn't have to do much work.
2007-02-09 04:56:05 · answer #1 · answered by wdunn27 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well they are both Elite Receiver's when your in school and people Say did u see O Boy Get Mossed people dont say did u see O Boy Get T.O ed so i would say Randy hes got better Hands hes Faster and can Jump Higher
2007-02-09 12:59:46 · answer #2 · answered by Antawn B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Moss. Both are talented and athletic...I think Moss might have more raw talent, he just hasnt been allowed to flourish in the system in Oakland yet. His breakaway speed and leaping ability make him dangerous and a very tough matchup for any CB.
TO has always been the bigger ego, too. Moss' worst transgressions were a fake mooning and walking off the field too early, and occasional bouts of pouting. Owens' include public feuds with 2 different QBs, an "overdose attempt", a "children's novel", etc. I'd take a little petulance over full blown sociopathy any day.
Plus, TO has proven that he's always going to be a locker room cancer, and attention whore, and doesnt seem to apologize for it or ever want to change his ways about it. Moss has proven thats he's willing to try and be a good citizen, is willing to lower his profile; I think in a good system Moss might prove he's reformed, or at least moreso than TO ever would.
2007-02-09 02:16:50 · answer #3 · answered by droid327 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither, both are head cases and even with their immense talent neither turns out to be a net gain for their team - but that doesn't answer your question.
I would definitely take T.O.. Although he is a huge distraction and has been a cancer to every team he has played for in the NFL, when he is on the field he plays. His pride as an athlete and a competitor makes him as dangerous a threat to the other team when he is on the field as he is to his own when he is off.
Moss on the hand is a least as bad off the field and to make matters worse he chooses when he wants to play and when he does not "need" to. What a waste of talent.
2007-02-09 02:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by MLD 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I will take Moss, if you give him a good QB and win games I think he will be happy. T.O. will cause problems where ever he goes. He was winning with the 49ers and the Eagles and he was still unhappy their is no pleasing him.
2007-02-09 13:54:56 · answer #5 · answered by MJMGrand 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither, they are both over the age of 30 and are assholes. T.O. has as many drops as touchdowns and randy moss needs to be tied to a string in order to catch a ball in a raiders jersey anywayz
2007-02-09 02:38:14 · answer #6 · answered by Jwill 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Moss. He's more talented (and I think he's not as "past prime" as people say ---he's just in a crappy system) and less destructive. Randy may whine or make a couple "rude" comments, but TO is bad even when he is playing good (well, not as much was he was) --ex: when he gets all hyped up --"I LOVE ME SOME ME!" or the classic "Git Your Popcorn Ready!" ---then he's all "hyped" and explodes when any little thing happens to him. I actually think TO's a good guy (watch ESPN's Sports Century on him and you'll atleast agree a little) but his personality is just too big.
2007-02-09 09:51:54 · answer #7 · answered by Andy T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Randy Moss is a lot less annoying and destructive. It's like comparing a F3 and a F5 tornado. I'm going with the F3, less damage control needed with Moss.
2007-02-09 02:07:31 · answer #8 · answered by sweetie_tdp 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
T.O. is better on the Field and never quits in my opinion. Moss said early on he plays when he feels like it and never seemed to change.
2007-02-09 08:21:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd sign them both, then throw them in a steel cage together and keep the one that comes out alive LOL! My money would be on T.O. He's one big mofo!
2007-02-09 09:29:39 · answer #10 · answered by bad_dog76 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋