I don't know if she did or not. She definately seems sleazy but I don't see how they had enough evidence to convict her.
2007-02-08 15:46:53 · 5 answers · asked by sunflowers 4 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I am not really sure, but given the evidence or lack there of, I find it hard to believe she was convicted given they couldn't ever put the arsenic near her.
2007-02-08 15:50:50 · answer #1 · answered by Kathy L 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I really don't know. I think it's possible, but also not enough proof to where there is reasonable doubt in my heart. I really think if she did do it she is a sick twisted individual. If she didn't do it, then it's an injustice. . I don't see how the jury convicted her. There wasn't enough evidence.
I guess what it boils down to, is there reasonable doubt? In my mind, yes. But the jury convicted her and there may have been more evidence at the trial and things we didn't see that perhaps the jury saw. There must have been something more to the evidence, considering the jury convicted her so fast.
2007-02-09 01:09:41 · answer #2 · answered by yomama23 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She did some things very fast after her husband died like getting online dating and using the money to get breast implants, I think it was only a matter of days that her husband died that she was using his insurance money to do this.
Now its normal for a wife to move on after a period of mourning but in her case it was like she was ready as soon as he died.
2007-02-08 23:56:15 · answer #3 · answered by days_o_work 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares. And what does it really matter? Try focusing on something important, and not dwelling on what the media is feeding you.
2007-02-08 23:56:41 · answer #4 · answered by Logical Earthling 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No.
2007-02-08 23:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋