well, we're sick of reading it...it takes war to achieve peace. peace doesn't come by itself. we can either be in war, or have the whole world blown up because of one stupid hippie.
2007-02-08 15:18:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by DeceptiConservative 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I can understand your frustration, but the premise of your question is false.
We are engaged in a war on terror - and, like it or not, Iraq has become the center and the focal point of this war.
The justifications are plenty and the decision to invade came from both sides of the isle, based on the same intelligence as the president had, as well as many foreign intelligence agencies.
I am proud that we finally responded to these murdering dirt bags - and not follow the Islamic terrorist butt kissing policy of the French or Spainish or the rest of the world in further ignoring this threat.
History has proved that our ineffective policies of not responding militarily to the terror, murder and maiming of thousands of innocent men, women and children only led to more terror, finally culminating in the events of 9/11.
I hope you get my point.
2007-02-09 00:06:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get a life. It is not a game a checkers, you can't just leave in the middle of the game, takes on a life of it's own. US broke it now required to TRY and fix it.
As far as violence and death in the world, it is the human condition, learn to live with it it isn't going anywhere.
2007-02-08 23:19:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dane 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
So, the Libs don't care for the war, that makes it unjust? Remember, there were just a couple votes in congress and the Senate that were opposed, and it was sanctioned by the UN, and we had lots of other nations there helping........so its unjust if you "hate Bush", right?
2007-02-09 00:28:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by jonn449 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
You're wrong, there is nothing unjust about the war and we should not stop until we win. If you want to lose, get out the way and let the people who are serious about winning do their job.
2007-02-08 23:44:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
then stop typing this message,liberal, Bush is not the cause of the war,he is only trying to stop it or those terrorists would come and ruin America, if you don;t understand this, which you don't ,get over it, it will stop when it stops, we don't like the war, and neither does Bush,but he knows that there is a time for war,
2007-02-08 23:51:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Unjust- So you have it all figured out. What we are doing in Iraq is a beautiful thing.
2007-02-08 23:36:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
actually, its quite funny, at first i thought the war was unjust. Then i found the widely accpeted definition, and it turns out, the war is just
2007-02-08 23:18:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Captain Planet 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Nobody wants to take the blame....If congress cuts funding it would all fall on them. We usually wait til things are real, real bad to solve a problem....Nobody wants to get blamed, they just want to point fingers...As to WHY it should be stopped? You'll get different answers..
2007-02-08 23:19:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by breenras 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Really!! We did everything we set out to do. They don't want us there. So why? Maybe Bush and his chase for oil?
2007-02-08 23:19:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋