2007-02-08 14:09:02 · 20 answers · asked by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Only if he buys a ticket. Because he's not a great QB.
2007-02-09 09:04:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, as a result of his current off-the-field conduct, his on-the-field influence on the game is again questioned. I strongly believe that Michael Vick will be a hall of famer in the future, he has not only played well, he has developed an entirely new way to play QB in the NFL. Sure, there are plenty of scrambling QBs throughout the NFL's history, but none of them have had such an enormous impact on their team. Though he hasn't had a tremendous success in the playoffs, he's lead his team there on several occasions. Also, I've yet to mention the fact that he rushed for 1,000+ yards this year, a feat that no other quarterbacks have accomplished. When considering candidates for the hall of fame, off the field conduct should be overlooked. Steroids is another issue, Michael Vick has never been amongst people named for using. You have to figure Michael will put up numbers similar to this year for several more years, he's only 26 after all. Michael Vick has added a new dimension to pro football, and for that alone I feel he deserves consideration. Let's let Michael's numbers do the talking, they will likely present a pretty good argument.
2007-02-08 22:53:34 · answer #2 · answered by D Young 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Vick when retired and eligible will be in the Hall of Fame one day, but not a first ballot. We all know about his stats about rushing for over a 1,000 yards for the first time a QB has ever did that, but his passing game has to pick up and has to be consistent throughout games and throughout the season. Posting back-to-back winning seasons would help his resume and hopefully he and the Atlanta Falcons could make it work throughout postseason play as well.
2007-02-09 00:58:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to The Grand Puba...a pioneer for running QB? thats just nonsense, he's making more and more teams believe they need a Pocket QB rather than a "running" QB. that is not a pioneer, that is just doing the opposite.
besides, what good is a Running QB if he has trouble getting 80.0+ QB ratings. (in fact only 1 year he had over 80 qb rating...he got a 81.6)
now the QB rating is to rate how efficient the QB is. Michael Vick's rushing does not account for the QB rating...so lets add that in. if we put in his yards rushing and TD scored for this year his QB rating would be 88.5...and that is for his best year not his overall. and that 88.5 number is also inflated only because it assumes he threw more yards with less attempts.
i am not saying he is a bad QB, im just saying he is not good enough for the hall of fame. if he can get a better reciver i think he will be great, but he still won't be HOF worthy.
and to *JUICED* southern kali YG- yea i remember the falcons before 2002. they went to the superbowl in 1999.
2007-02-08 23:24:32 · answer #4 · answered by Kev C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not as a hall of fame inductee. He may be in for most yards ran by a QB and a few other records. He is not a great QB and you have to be great to be inducted into the hall of fame. He isnt very accurate and fumbles an awful lot. Put him behind a better line he maybe a better QB but I dont think Reggie Wayne and Marvin Harrison could make him great. Peace out...........
2007-02-08 22:15:27 · answer #5 · answered by powerliftingrules 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well the Nfl has already conceded he is the best qb runner currently in the leage maybe of all time however with such a statement shouldnt he be going further than he has been going the man does not win enough games he needs to take his team to great places otherwise he wont be in the hall of fame
2007-02-08 22:25:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No...because any quarterback that they had to throw out 2/3 of the offensive playbook in college so he could run '1 reads' is not going to succeed at the pro level(where he still essentially runs '1 reads') ...while its true that he is physically gifted (strong arm and great speed) its been proven that to be a great pro you have to deliver from the pocket...130 million for him to play quarterback was absurd...look back at all the super bowl winning QBs...then consider which ones are in the hall, or considered to be the best of all time...
2007-02-08 22:18:53 · answer #7 · answered by doingitright44 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!! whoever thinks Vick has even an OUTSIDE shot at making the hall of fame is CLEARLY a moron who knows nothing about football. you think being the first QB to rush for 1000 yards is a ticket to the HOF ?????? LMFAO !!!!!!!!! classic !!!!! Michael Vick is a pile of garbage who will NEVER make the HOF, id bet my daughters life on it.
2007-02-09 11:49:23 · answer #8 · answered by Dawgmeat17 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea but his name wont be apart of atlanta falcons but let's see what happens next year it took payton manning a long time b4 he got a ring he 30,31 now but alot of people like to say vick aint good because he hasent took his team to the superbowl. vick maid the falcon THE FALCONS tell the truth who would be talking about THE FALCONS if vick didn't make them THE. do you remember anything about the falcons b4 2002
added later
to the 6th guy to answer he only was flicking off one fan not all of them so dont put DUBS on it
2007-02-08 22:38:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If his career went exactly as it has to now for the second half of his career, I don't think he'll get in. He'll be remembered regardless though. But say he wins a Super Bowl in between (just one), absolutely he'll get in. I think that's all he's lacking and people in general like him too much to let him pass. He just needs a receiver or two and he might just do it.
2007-02-08 22:21:54 · answer #10 · answered by ronaldoradano 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He will need to become a better QB. And I also believe he will need to win a Super Bowl. Without that, the pioneering of being a great running QB becomes a dead conversation.
2007-02-08 22:22:53 · answer #11 · answered by James K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋