In my opinion, it's a vapid, feel-good response to a non-existent "problem". The people who favor these types of ideas will tell you, "Young African-Americans need historical role-models, people who look like them to get them interested in their heritage".
While I agree that one's heritage is something to be treasured and celebrated, the primary heritage to be honored should be "American", not "African-American". Instead of spending valuable time teaching kids that the inventor of the traffic signal was a black man (wonderful, but still more like trivia than history), we'd be better served if kids learned about the Intolerable Acts, the Missouri Compromise, the buildup to the Civil War, etc...
2007-02-08
13:42:44
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Rick N
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
thequeenreigns: You missed my point. Every other month is NOT "White History Month" as there IS no white history, only history. History in general is being neglected in our schools, and the last thing we need is a reason to water it down further.
2007-02-08
13:54:24 ·
update #1
jenny b: you don't feel the Emancipation Proclamation belongs in the realm of US History, as opposed to Black History?
2007-02-08
14:18:46 ·
update #2