English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am so excited to hear that there is even a poll about this on his website. I just want him to run to get the real issues in the debate. I am so tired of the demorepublican party. Check it out:

http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/index.html

2007-02-08 13:02:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

He would win hands down.

2007-02-08 13:14:35 · update #1

9 answers

Right On. I'd not only vote for him but also work on his campaign.

2007-02-08 13:08:09 · answer #1 · answered by MOLLY 2 · 1 1

i does no longer vote for Michael Savage for President, if he ran, commonly because of the fact he's merely too emotionally volatile to be an outstanding President. He might make the comparable mistake that the Bush administration made up of appearing too unilaterally, different than he might take this unilateralism to even better extremes that no longer even the dogmatic Bush administration might have dared to take it. He has spent lots of his political occupation vilifying the full left via characterizing the full left as sharing the comparable philosophy and features as people who're on the unconventional edge of the left wing circulate. This predilection, via Michael Savage, to portray the competition so unfairly, potential that he could be basically too unfavorable to cooperation, whether that cooperation could be good for the rustic. Having listened to Savage, on his prepare the Savage united states of america, and having examine his books “The Savage united states of america”, “The Enemy interior”, and “Liberalism is A psychological illness”, i will actual say that his own attitude is so skewed by way of previous injustices he perceived he replaced into subject to, by way of political correctness from the left, that he might by no potential be a honest Commander and chief. Any guy who believes that international kinfolk is for the vulnerable, and extols the virtues of preemptive conflict shouldn’t be President of america. Any guy that believes selection has been basically deleterious to united states of america shouldn’t be President. Any guy who believes that we've been a extra effective united states of america interior the Nineteen Fifties than we are as we communicate shouldn’t be President. Any guy who glorifies the barbarity contained interior the previous testomony, and believes that we could continually word such barbarism to as we communicate’s worldwide shouldn’t be President. So no, i might by no potential vote for him.

2016-11-02 22:46:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

hes a very intelligent man...

and it may be because he's on the radio.. but he is pretty strong minded.. and pretty tough on his beliefs...

i think hes more of a... know the right answer, very republican.. type of a person...

what i mean, for example..

Immigration.

Savage wants to stop the mexicans crossing the border and for many good reasons + statistics... hes very good at knowing whats right, and backing up his position with hard facts the general media dont tell you.

however, i cant see him as the president...
he just ..isnt the president type of person.

i cant see savage writing up official white house documents that will successfully replace social security...
nor can i see him having diplomatic talks with foreign countries.
not neccessarily the talks democrats for some reason think will stop Iran's nuclear threats.. rather diplomatic talks just to understand each other as representatives + leaders of their respective countries.

Hes more of a talk-your-mind and teach the listeners intelligent things about the american politics and foreign affairs....
rather then really sit behind a desk, making calls to other foreign/us government advisors/officials and write up plans + official statements for things like social security or the conflict in the middle east.

hes a smart man, he may be able to do it...
all im saying...

i like rudy guiliani with mccain as VP and lieberman as sec of state...

id rather savage run as speaker of the congress rather then pelosi... congress is where we REALLY need an IQ boost...

2007-02-08 13:23:35 · answer #3 · answered by Corey 4 · 0 0

Yes.

2007-02-08 13:22:27 · answer #4 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 2 0

Savage should run to catch the mail.

2007-02-08 13:08:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 3

yes why not.

2007-02-08 19:51:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He wouldn't win. He just wouldn't.

*UPDATE*

No, no he wouldn't.

2007-02-08 13:09:05 · answer #7 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 0 1

yES

2007-02-08 13:05:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No...

2007-02-08 13:08:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers