...why don't we just create a new economy, world and conditions where things like that don't happen? As long as things stay the same, won't we have to keep doing it over and over again?
2007-02-08 12:52:05 · 12 answers · asked by Source 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Good luck. Starting a new world where humans know no injustice, prejudice, aren't greedy, jealous, and aren't, at times, downright a**h**les, is not only not likely to happen, it isn't going to happen.
2007-02-12 15:43:30 · answer #1 · answered by jorst 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question. The problem though is that people are people. If you started all over, the same patterns of humanity that messed up the world system as we know would resurface and in time everything would return to the way it is now. There will always be greedy, power-hungry people and people who are lazy and want someone else to carry the load for them. That's why the current needs of humanity exist and always will. Jesus, who historically started one of the greatest humanitarian efforts in the world, the Christian church, (some pro's and con's on this subject) stated, "the poor you will always have with you". The reason he said it is because what makes people poor is a mixture of greed and laziness.
2007-02-14 17:46:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is beyond my ability to conceive of any way in which you could scrap everything.
We are trying to attend to the problems we have and we have made some gains. More can be done and it has come from within the existing framework. Those that are blessed with wealth and power have to become the servants of all mankind. Anybody else must do what he can.
2007-02-16 11:26:32 · answer #3 · answered by Charlie Kicksass 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama is symbolic of substitute and not in any respect something else. he's black adequate to instill which have of massive difference yet not darkish adequate to reason indifference. he's, for my area, the guinea pig of 21st century politics. If he succeeds, then a barrier is broken; if not, then the political international will wait 4 better years for yet another guinea pig to attain. Obama is qualified, yet at the same time as you'll vote on starting place of qualification then Hillary or McCain ought to win. again, in case you vote for him, its for the attraction of breaking down a huge barrier and taking a stride into equality.
2016-12-03 22:25:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Survival requires moving forward. I think there is a theory like that, explaining why certain species have evolved over time, and things like that. I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for, but there also is the reason that we don't have complete solutions for all of those things, and cooperation of millions of people is involved. Plus, most people think of profit over health and etc.
2007-02-08 13:02:12 · answer #5 · answered by NeonBlue 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For starters, if you create that economy there wouldn't be gap between the rich and poor. The elite rich, the people truly in control, will never let that happen.
2007-02-08 13:01:13 · answer #6 · answered by james m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Environmentalists. Socialists. I've spent a life trying. Some things have improved from my efforts. I'm sixty. I pass on to you with love this impossible dream!
To make the impossible possible!
The future of the species depends on it!
2007-02-14 14:27:31 · answer #7 · answered by salubrious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alas! -It's because things are the way they ARE, that we would only be re-creating the mess we're IN, by starting all over again. In short, the more things change... Nice try though... :)
2007-02-08 13:09:45 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Give poor overpopulated regions birth control...Not money or food !
2007-02-15 08:52:25 · answer #9 · answered by Don A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
~~~~u got here don't u think that big brother is already here to help u sort out all these desisions that you'll have to make to let them help u for a fee of course
2007-02-08 13:07:54 · answer #10 · answered by bev 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋