English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

would you take it??? why or why not??

2007-02-08 12:17:47 · 4 answers · asked by Jynx™ 2 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

Absolutely! Anyone that dumb is too stupid to have that much money. It would be a moral imperative to relieve them of the money.

2007-02-08 13:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If morality supercedes material wealth for people, which it does in my own life, then no I could never accept that money. Bush has caused the death of arguably at least 1 million people, his inane foreign policy has cost us more lives than 9/11 and has led us off track from our starting focal point which was afghanistan where bin laden is hiding. He has made the tentative middle east hate us more than they did before and turned the moderates into extremists. Sorry for the Bush rant but when it comes down to 50 million dollars or another million lives, the moral imperative in such a situation requires no demands that the money not be taken so as to preserve the sanctity of life which is the individual's foremost human right. To save so many lives for only 50 million is a gift, most people would pay that much to preserve ONE life. It just goes to show where your priorities are and where they should lie.

2007-02-08 22:29:57 · answer #2 · answered by khsora23 2 · 0 0

Never accept any amount because President Bush cannot extend his tenure of office since it is not allowed under the constitution.

2007-02-08 21:09:06 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Yes. I dislike Bush immensely, but he hasn't really effect my life enough to warrant making me fabulously rich.

2007-02-08 20:30:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers