He still is one of them.
2007-02-08 11:34:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, he was not good for America. His liberal lifestyle and tolerance for terrorism, degraded the integrity and security of this great nation.
He made a mockery of the office of the Presidency. His affair with Monica was unacceptable, especially for a man in his position. It showed he was a coward and was weak.
I don't believe America wanted him in office. I think that if Ross Perot had not split the Republican vote, Clinton wouldn't have had a chance.
I believe that if H. Clinton is elected, America may cease to be a sovereign nation because of her one world government views.
2007-02-08 19:41:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by John in AZ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has agreed with Bush, especially with the war. I wish he would have been more aggressive against the enemy, and he closed down too many military bases. But he wasnt bad for the economy, so that is a plus. He certainly is not one of the best, but Im not one of those guys who is going to blame 9/11 on him.
2007-02-08 19:55:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he turned his head when terrorists struck and let the problem fester. He pulled out of Samilia when the going got tuff and did not finish the job. He did nothing as a president, which is why we had 9/11. Best Presidents, come on, Read non biased books on Regan, this is not a Rep, or Dem answer just a common sense answer. DO you want a strong America, or weak one? We Pull out of Iraq without getting the job done and we will be doomed, we already have hundreds of sleeper cells of terrorists who are just waiting for the signal, all it will take is us showing ouy weakenss which is the path we are heading down. WAKE UP AMERICANS
2007-02-08 19:30:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by 4sanity 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think Bill Clinton was a good President, he would be rated amoung the best except for the sex incident. The sex didn't bother me as much as his follow up, But when he left office, my kids were not in debt to the tune of about 30 grand each to make up for the Bush spending on a silly war.
All the other countries laughed at us because we made so much about the sex thing, other leaders have that behavior on their daily schedule. Reagan was one of the worst.
2007-02-08 19:40:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nort 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, not only is he a pathological liar who bastardized the Presidency by being a pervert, but he ignored terrorists and the problem escalated because of it. His refusal to deal with important issues that needed to be addressed made him an unsound President.
2007-02-08 19:55:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jenny A_331 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
exactly what does he agree with gwb on?
are you sure clinton is talking about the shrub and not senior(still a failure in my books, but history has a way of sugar coating real events)
and why do neoclowns want to forever link clinton with one bj?
Well, paybacks a female dog, and gwb will forever be linked with a failed war.
Try reading this for a better understanding of the neoclown point of view.
2007-02-08 19:30:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bill is tops and how did he leave a bad taste in Monica's mouth?
2007-02-08 19:34:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by lorna233 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I do no think Bill Clinton, would have been president, if it had not been for Hilary, in his court. She was the women behind the President, that got him were he is. He is merely a pretty face with a puppet master, Hilary.
2007-02-08 19:30:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Suel 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
History will prove he was one of the best presidents.
2007-02-09 02:20:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, Bill was 10 x better than Bush regardless of his pecadillos which was nobody's business but his wife's.
2007-02-08 19:34:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋