i know it sounds really absurd but some of my friends seriously claim that is true.
2007-02-08 11:08:17 · 11 answers · asked by �a�r� D 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
not, it's not true, buddy holly had drums, bob wills got kicked off the grand ole opery for bringing drums in the 40's. Not to mention Jazz and swing bands with the brushes on the end of the drumsticks.
2007-02-08 11:11:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny ha ha. There's always been drums. Think of the 20's 30's 40's 50's I can't think of a time there wasn't drums. Buddy Rich a famous drummer from the 40 and 50's would be hurt that no one remembered him.
2007-02-08 11:14:06 · answer #2 · answered by Extra Blue Note 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do not imagine a lot of people will argue that their early stuff is better effective than their later stuff, so i ought to ought to say the drugs extremely did help them out. Their best suited albums (you understand, Revolver, Abbey street, Sgt. Peppers, The White Album, and Rubber Soul) are all very severe, solid albums. help! and all of those before that are solid, yet they're not . . . you understand, Beatles solid. grow to be there ever a time again contained in the Nineteen Sixties and 1970s at the same time as drugs did not play a position in impressive music? If something, drugs were a stunning good element . . . each body grow to be on them. also, a word: i'm exceptionally particular Bob Dylan in hardship-free words presented them to pot. in case you examine Pattie's e book, she and George were presented to LSD via their dentist (who slipped it into their espresso). John grow to be starting up with it purely round a similar time. Pattie and George disliked it, and George grow to be much better of a cocaine guy besides. @ShoBzOne: Er, are you speaking about the finest suited music producer of all time, GEORGE MARTIN? believe me, it grow to be he and The Beatles themselves who made such impressive music. The Beatles at the instantaneous are not the fabricated from some crafty sound engineer. they're purely magnificent.
2016-12-03 22:19:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beatles didn't visit America until 1964, there were already famous drummers in American music
2007-02-08 11:18:22 · answer #4 · answered by lowpointroad 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find it amusing how people think the Beatles brought rock n' roll to America. Hate to break it to you, but it was already here!
The Beatles DID NOT bring drums to America...geesh.
2007-02-08 11:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by Led*Zep*Babe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a bunch of bull, have they never heard of jazz, blues or the ones who created rock and roll? the beatles were influenced by american musicians. Tell your friends to do some research.
2007-02-08 11:17:32 · answer #6 · answered by digby_by 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not true, but they did popularize the four piece rock band, guitars (lead, rhythm,bass)and drums. Saxophones fell out of favour.
2007-02-08 11:12:05 · answer #7 · answered by Crash 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your friends are gullible and you are too if you believe it.
I can't find a thing about it
It's obviously made up.
2007-02-08 11:11:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow...that's one of the dumbest things I've heard lately.
2007-02-08 11:15:48 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph's Mama 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
completly false. jazz, big band, rock n' roll?
2007-02-08 11:13:42 · answer #10 · answered by iron chef bryan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋