Julio is fast and Peter is tall. Which is better?
2007-02-08 10:26:35 · 4 answers · asked by ABC,123 ..i could go on 4 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
Julio Baptista, no contest
Peter Crouch, Very tall, but cannot head a ball, a strong wind would blow him over, has no pace, no skill, cannot take free kicks, struggles against any half decent defender, not an established striker in what is a really poor Liverpool attack.
Julio Baptista - Built like a brick out house, strikes a fantastic free kick, has pace, aggression, skill, can score with either foot, and has made his mark in his first season in English football. If he decides to stay, he will be one to watch for next season.
2007-02-09 05:05:44 · answer #1 · answered by Tazman 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Julio Baptista
2007-02-09 08:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
very good question
1 of the most hard I've ever had to answer
well as a big fan of them both I'll have to say baptista cos he can control the ball better
but both very good players
2007-02-09 10:57:40 · answer #3 · answered by Frihah Anti-Milanist 4lyf! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Beast any day of the week
2007-02-09 06:46:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋