It is for the school newspaper. It is on whether we believe juveniles shall recieve capital punishment.
I am against the juvenile capital punishment because I believe that the government’s power over its citizens should be limited. It should be limited in certain ways in order to preserve freedom from tyranny. One of those limits should be that the government should not have the right to kill citizens of any age. People make mistakes at every age, even though some of the mistakes are stupid, they should not be put to death for it.
It is also proven that the human brain is still forming at the age when a person is still considered a juvenile. If someone committed a crime that would now a day be considered getting put to death for, then that person shall not be put to death but get tried as an adult, possibly getting life in prison without parole. Death is a relief to criminals who know they will be suffering the rest of their life in prison, why should they be granted that?
2007-02-08
10:24:44
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Education & Reference
➔ Higher Education (University +)
Juveniles tend to get in trouble because they have bad home lives, peer pressure, or they don't have good adult supervision. I don't think they should be put to death for it. Ruthless punishment I believe will eventually teach that juvenile who committed the crime and they will regret and suffer for the insanity of a crime they committed. If put to death, then that juvenile will not learn and regret what they did.
I also used the writing from people who helped me make my decision.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070208140002AAXiBlB&r=w
2007-02-08
10:25:16 ·
update #1
Wow John Hightower. You just completely reversed my thought of this. I do not fell like re-typing this, but I see where you are coming from.
2007-02-08
10:43:33 ·
update #2