I would!
2007-02-08 10:24:35 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Just to piss off the whiney liberals in this country I would vote for him as President.
2007-02-08 10:35:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Liberal or Conservative, you should consider one thing: have you ever seen Bill O'Reilly's demeanor when he gets angry? I sure wouldn't want to be Kim Jong Il, sitting across the table from him! I'd probably c*ap in my pants!
Sure, I'd vote for Mr. O'Reilly. He's smart enough to listen to the right people. I'm sure it would be the first Presidency where the Vice President (Newt Gingrich) would play an extremely active role. I think they'd make a lot of decisions together. Newt is an absolute genius. Every time he speaks I am more impressed with his intellect and his depth of understanding.
2007-02-08 10:34:03 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
confident i might yet Fox information do no longer elect him to Run, they elect Sean Hannity to flow against Obama, via fact he's a Republican and could no longer Blow their disguise or Crack decrease than rigidity, They be conscious of with the intention to triumph over the guy save Your Cool, Have concerns decrease than administration, How else might Reagan win vs Carter and different Left Leaning Politicians who Promoted Socialism, If that became genuine the Soviets might Run united statesa. appropriate now.
2016-12-17 05:31:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The person who serves as president must be ope minded and objective and at times willing to compromise. Bill Reilly has to stroke his ego and he never gives in to another persons opinion.
2007-02-09 04:14:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He is a dreadful man, simply simply dreadful. Why would I? Most of his comments are negative, that will certainly not help bipartisanship and making Congress work together seamlessly as well as party cooperation, which as you know, is currently a big issue with our government.
2007-02-08 10:44:24 · answer #5 · answered by Giliathriel 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh hell no! The man is an idiot. After GWB, we don't need another idiot in the White House who thinks he can do no wrong and is arrogant enough not to listen to the American people.
2007-02-08 10:57:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if he was running as a horse dung picker-upper. That way he could finally get as much as he dishes out. Smells about the same too.
2007-02-08 10:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by ttpawpaw 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
No, he is against the death penalty. However, I would vote for Michael Savage
2007-02-08 10:56:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, but it would be great if he did, as it would only further weaken the standing of the republican party. And it this point, thats pretty difficult.
2007-02-08 10:48:29 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Mister 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, I would not, and if you happen to live in San Francisco you might want to move before he takes office, nuclear attacks can ruin your day.
2007-02-08 10:30:06 · answer #10 · answered by clueless_nerd 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋