2007-02-08 10:15:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Dining Out ➔ United States ➔ Other - US Dining Out
i wouldn't be surprised. fast food is freaking nasty.
2007-02-08 10:19:10 · answer #1 · answered by tinap1203 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that is about right, but don't forget, when they say "fish" that can be things like fish heads, eyes, guts, fins etc. I'm sure that it's not prime fish filet!
I remember reading that McDonalds hamburgers were 70% soy protein, the fact that the wrapper stated "100% real beef" that was the name of the wrapper company!!
2007-02-08 18:54:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
May be true, not surprising, fish, including salted-fish is very expensive, I know of other eating-places world-wide which have very little fish in other fish recipes.Now-a-days, if you eat a recipe that requires fish, and it has in plenty, the eat-ing place is highly recommended.
2007-02-10 00:27:41 · answer #3 · answered by skeetejacquelinelightersnumber7 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe its a low percentage but if only 2% it probably wouldnt even taste of fish!! i think more likely 10 - 20%.
2007-02-08 18:21:45 · answer #4 · answered by mustlovedogs0 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say they did a great job if it's true - because it tastes like it has more than 2% fish to me.
2007-02-08 19:36:44 · answer #5 · answered by swy3388 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah must be coz the chicken burgers n nuggets are 10% chicken! taste go good tho!
like those microwave burgers 2 are only 9% meat!
2007-02-09 19:00:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but if you said 20% I might agree.
The info in this Wiki-article says 25% protein, but may not all be fish.
2007-02-08 20:39:47 · answer #7 · answered by pwei34 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't be surprised.
2007-02-08 18:25:54 · answer #8 · answered by Roxy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didnt even think it had that much in it!
2007-02-08 18:19:57 · answer #9 · answered by ♣Kellina♣ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That much?
2007-02-08 19:00:00 · answer #10 · answered by JOHN B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋