2007-02-08 09:49:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Evidence points to yes if you think like a lawyer.
He's the one with most to gain. He is a lawyer who does not appear to have a regular job other than attending to Anna Nicole, and he's listed on the birth certificate as the father of Dannielynn. By killing both Anna Nicole and her son, he would be able to control the proceeds from the Marshall fortune should the estate of Anna win or successfully settle the lawsuit. With Anna Nicole dead, he could more easily settle the lawsuit. And, as "legal" father of Dannielynn, who still appears to be located in the Bahamas, he could put up all sorts of legal roadblocks to other gold digging men claiming to be the biological father of Dannielynn to induce them to settle as well.
There are additional suspicious observations. Both Anna and her son were quite young when they died within months of each other under extremely unlikely circumstances. Howard has been reported to be the one who found the son dead. Howard has been reported to have given the son methadone. Anna Nicole has been reported to be taking drugs prescribed for Howard. Howard had been previously reported to have found Anna Nicole unconscious face down in a pool. According to some accounts, Anna died only a month prior to attending a scheduled investigative hearing on her son's death in March.
Interestingly, Howard and Anna have been reported to have engaged in a commitment ceremony that is not quite a marriage. As a lawyer, Howard may have wanted the ceremony to provide evidence that Anna loved him without having to incur the legal obligations associated with marriage.
2007-02-10 23:17:21 · answer #1 · answered by randomopin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely he killed her, and her son Daniel, and E. Pierce Marshall last year. Now the one with the best chance to cash in on the J. Howard Marshall lottery (up to $800 million, for those of you paying attention) is five month old Dannielynn Smith Marshall Stern, currently Anna Nicole's only heir. And who do you think gets to act as custodian to this vast fortune until Ms. Smith Marshall Stern turns 25? I bet he spends it all by then.
The problem for Mr. Stern is that he might not be the baby's real father. With $800 million at stake, two other gentlemen are claiming paternity. If he's not the father, he gets custodianship of nothing.
But he definitely did it.
Then again, I think Karl Rove and Dick Cheney took down the World Trade Center. So accept my ramblings with a grain of salt!
:)
2007-02-09 09:54:29 · answer #2 · answered by vt500ascott 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably so. check out my question on the link below.
Mom of B & D
2007-02-08 09:52:55 · answer #3 · answered by Mom of B & D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be silly, everyone knows it was Elvis!
2007-02-08 10:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by Indiana Jones 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I think she had a drug problem. Maybe he contributed???
2007-02-08 09:56:36 · answer #5 · answered by Elvis lives! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lookin' mighty suspicious!!!!
But.... WHY???
2007-02-08 09:53:55 · answer #6 · answered by tigerbritches 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋