English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I assure you, Gore is personally damaging our environment more than I am. How could you doubt me on that simple fact ?

2007-02-08 09:28:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

krinkn- I need to get my food from Chile. The growing season isn`t very cooperative here in MN...Been below zero for days.....Gore is a farmer ?...Good and evil is what Gore is preaching, concerning "global warming".

2007-02-08 09:57:20 · update #1

13 answers

I agree with you! I can't figure out how Gore is helping our environment, when he flies around in his private jet!
I have no problem with airplanes or SUVs, but I believe that Al Gore should "practice what he preaches."


p.s. One other thing that bothers me about Gore is what I remember learning in Science class in High School... We learned that most (I think it was 80 or 90%) of air pollution is caused by natural sources-not your Cadillac :)

2007-02-08 09:35:58 · answer #1 · answered by ♥honey♥ 4 · 1 0

Sugar, I think you are missing the point of the whole global warming thing. This isn't a good and evil issue. It is simply about making choices.

Why not choose a more fuel efficient vehicle next time? Or choose to buy food that is grown locally (like at your local farmers market) rather than food shipped from Chile?

If you feel like you have to drive a Cadillac because your hemroids hurt too much for you to drive a more fuel efficient vehicle; then let that be your choice.

If Gore needs a Suburban to carry hay bales or cow feed around his farm that is his choice.

I would hope that you would both be making choices in other parts of your life that would make up for your less-than efficient vehicles. Maybe you could have a motorcycle or Scooter for getting around town?

So to reiterate...not good and evil...just you making informed decisions.

2007-02-08 17:47:16 · answer #2 · answered by krinkn 5 · 0 0

THE NECESSARY LAW FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Dominated by a powerful and natural instinct of survival, the human being has been transported through the pass of time toward his multiplication, to be able occupy completely some day our big and extensive planet. Two thosand and five hundred years ago, the Roman patricians promulgated the first shelter law (or guardianship) still today effective which, invites at the parents to give dress, bed and food at the minors age. With it, many minors could obtain the necessary condition, to be able to stop the activities that often being smalls they were forced.
Unfortunately for we, imagine the effects of a permanent or continuous shelter for the people who wish it, has been until today and impossible issue. Now, our first mision is recognize that, with it, we can obtain many benefits. First, the necessary apparatus to safeguard in a natural way, our demographic levels for the future coming. In second place, with this simple law, fredom source and basic for many citizens – we also could get the necessary condition to put the point and end to the social disorders and sufferings like wars, prostitution, the poverty, the illness, the hunger, drugs, delinquency, crimes, emigration...
And finally, like third point with a more just and human shelter, besides obtaining the fruits of freedom, we will obtain the natural apparatus to safeguard and control ours planetarious levels of contamination and degradation due our due to our old and altruistic system of consumption for the future coming.
The reform of this law is an exercise that we must realize between all as rapidly as possible to avoid the appearance of the new evils.

JOSEP CAMPS
SPAIN
After reflect about this, help me to show this page at the people
http://www.leypaz.com
thank you.

2007-02-09 16:54:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Gore is damaging the environment in many ways. Not only his jets & SUV's bu all the hot air coming out of his mouth. I have no doubt at all that you are correct.

2007-02-08 17:39:22 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 0

I disagree with the people talking about how people in Congress are having more of an effect due to their air travel... people in Congress should be traveling between their home state and DC frequently... obviously travel is necessary but we have to find better fuel sources. that has little to do with your Caddy and I don't like it when people go on about how we need to take personal responsibility... no, we need help from the government in finding a fuel source which will allow us to travel from one place to another without destroying the world. Until we do, mileage and emissions standards don't bother me.

2007-02-08 17:32:54 · answer #5 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 0 1

Great point, it goes to show the two-faced nature of liberals.

Others:

Ted kennedy calling for gun control but killing his secretary with a car.

Rosie O'Donnell calls for gun control but wants a gun for her bodyguard.

Hillary Clinton testifying that nixon should be impeached for lying but standing by her man.

John Kerry hating big business but taking money from his wife's trust fund from the Heinz company.

2007-02-08 17:53:52 · answer #6 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 1 0

Al Gore and his Jets.

2007-02-08 17:40:00 · answer #7 · answered by eric c 5 · 1 0

burning a wood fire for 24 hours puts off more CO2 than running an suv for 4 months without turning it off.

2007-02-08 17:34:09 · answer #8 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 4 0

How about SAN FRAN NAN PELOSI, spewing out toxins from her jumbojet!

2007-02-08 17:36:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Go get him again it is the have and have nots?

2007-02-08 17:33:58 · answer #10 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers