2007-02-08 08:21:33 · 11 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'M CONFUSED. I THOUGHT THEY WERE ONE IN THE SAME.
2007-02-08 08:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The inside of a septic tank if George Bush was standing next to me at the edge of it. Look Georgie,there's a baby ruth floating in the water...get it Georgie.....get it
2007-02-08 08:25:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Which Clinton? And how much?
I'd pay to have dinner with Bill, he seems like a nice guy.
Hillary couldn't be there, though.
2007-02-08 08:40:46 · answer #3 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would much more like to pay to see Clinton than to pay to see GWB that is what you meant right?
2007-02-08 08:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) Wrong question. Should be "which would I pay more to NOT see.
2) Equal. I don't think there is any difference.
2007-02-08 08:48:52 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't pay for either one. If they were both free, Clinton.
2007-02-08 08:27:33 · answer #6 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton? George Clinton?
P-Funk is where it's at!
2007-02-08 08:25:38 · answer #7 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Both the same.
2007-02-08 08:27:05 · answer #8 · answered by zombiefighter1988 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i wouldn't pay to see either one.
2007-02-08 08:24:46 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
id buy a candy bar.
2007-02-08 08:24:33 · answer #10 · answered by Corey 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋