Well...nobody...and I mean nobody likes that guy. He appears to be a shady, sinister character. I just finished reading all the articles I could find on him and I don't like him either. I read where he searched Daniel's pockets right after he was found dead, took out some Meth pills and flushed them down the john...then denied any such thing. Could he have been the supplier? Why eliminate the evidence...they'd find it on autopsy anyway? Also it was he that secured the place in the Bahamas (and didn't pay the bill for the guy that found it) as a means to escape Birkhead's claim that she was on Meth while preggers and he was concerned about the health of the fetus. Birkhead's been out there all along and I believe Stern has been driving this bus of destruction as everyone else suspects. The truth will come out eventually. Her sister has a scathing book coming out...can't wait! Why was their a "commitment ceremony" done on a boat before they even buried Daniel? It wasn't even legal. Her other long time lawyer performed the ceremony and he quit working for her a week before she died. What scared him off? There are no surprises where money is concerned. Stern has dirty hands as I see it. Can't read it any other way as his behavior has been so blatantly territorial...like the vulture sitting on the tree branch just waiting for his prey. Stay tuned, huh?
2007-02-10 03:03:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is no evidence that points to the possibility, but one can ponder on whether he did all he could to assist both of them. We do not know the "true" circumstances that surrounded each death, so we will never know why each of them died so tragically. However, full investigations do need to be carried out, no matter how the deaths are characterized.
You would be surprised how America fantasizes over celebrity deaths. There is a website dedicated to celebrity deaths and grave sites. Truly strange to say the least. It even has photos of many of the deceased as well as their death certificates. Now if that isn't sick, I don't know what is.
As for the mucho dinero, Danielynn (infant daughter) will more than likely never see that money. If anyone knows about heir property and the laws surrounding it, Danielynn, not being Anna's deceased husband's daughter, may never stand to benefit.
2007-02-09 03:04:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by ladyshua 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think your theory has substance. I also heard on the news yesterday that that Anna had a private nurse there with her when she died. The nurse is the wife of Anna's bodyguard--he's the one who ministered CPR. Why would a registered nurse call the Bodyguard into do the CPR? By the way both of these people were hired by Stern. Stern has vowed today that Annas mother will not get within touching distance of the baby.
2016-05-23 22:16:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows but it is interesting to note her mother came out after her son's death saying Stern was involved and Anna Nicole was next.
2007-02-08 08:31:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Potcake 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do! I think that the fact he was present in both deaths plays a HUGE part in it. I also think they will say it was an overdose such as they did with Daniel's...but made to look that way! Howard K. Stern should not be able to come in contact with that baby. Its been said that he had a leash on her and her choices...why not her emotions. I am anxious to see where this goes, because this ,man looks awfully suspicious to me!
2007-02-09 07:25:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by design_and_create 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing short of a tragedy.....she had a lot of negative publicity, and whether we agree with any choices she made did not make her a bad person. May she rest in peace with her son, and may her daughter live a normal life with her father, whoever he may be. Needless to say the paternity suit will be stepped up to major importance now!
2007-02-08 08:27:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tangled Web 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe that they were both murdered. Either howard K Stern or the family of that old man she use to be married to -to keep her from getting millions of dollars.
This is so sad.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/02/08/anna.nicole.collapses/index.html
2007-02-08 08:24:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ஐ♥Julian'sMommy♥ஐ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is one of the first things someone said when we were discussing this tragedy. It has come to my mind too. It is quite a strange ordeal. Hopefully the truth will come out.
2007-02-08 13:30:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Annieo 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Would not be at all surprised--with her and her son gone, and if that little girl is his (biologically), he will be in charge of all that money she will inherit from her mother and the old man she was married to.....
2007-02-08 08:25:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by beetlejuice49423 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he was involved. It was either by commission (actually killing them) or by omission (providing access to substances he knew would hurt them). He's such an opportunist and she seemed like she was SOOOO gullible.
2007-02-12 04:47:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by TJTB 7
·
1⤊
0⤋