In 2006, I renewed my cell phone through an agent of Verizon’s named: WireFly
After having faithfully paid the entire amounts due each month for 6+ months, I copied and sent ALL information required to receive my $150 Customer Loyalty Rebate, including a copy of my wireless bill dated between 150 and 210 days after my activation date of 01/12/2006, which was no earlier than 06/11/2006 (150-days) and no later than 07/30/2006 (210-days); and then later revised by their on-screen WEB-site
( www.cellphonerebates.com ) which revised the original contract to read: “to be postmarked NOT earlier than 180-days” and in my case NOT earlier than 07/11/2006. Having done all this, I am still waiting as of Thursday, February 08, 2007 in what appears to be an intentional FRAUD perpetrated by Verizon and agent/s with regards to the payment of such rebates. Does anyone know of any CLASS Action against Verizon and its agent/s with regards to this matter of so-called: Customer Loyalty Rebate?
2007-02-08 08:16:59 · 4 answers · asked by Professor 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
On September 2, 2005, the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles issued an Order preliminarily approving the settlement of this class action. This site can help you obtain information about the status of the settlement and also help you determine whether you are a member of the settlement class who qualifies for benefits in this case.
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/footer/legalNotices/v710.jsp
The Plaintiffs claim that Verizon Wireless did not accurately disclose that certain Bluetooth features were not supported by the Motorola V710 handset available with Verizon Wireless cellular service. Verizon Wireless contends that its marketing materials were not deceptive and accurately informed customers of the Bluetooth profiles available for the Motorola V710 cellular handset available with Verizon Wireless service.
Based on the information available to them, the attorneys for the class concluded that the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and that it serves the best interests of class members
2007-02-11 16:18:55 · answer #1 · answered by King of the Net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the human beings of Japan are nonetheless suffering. Many are nonetheless homeless. Now you elect to extend their suffering via getting rid of the government of Japan's factors to restoration issues. additionally, are you able to fairly factor to any long term worldwide injury? No you won't be able to. till you reside interior 10 miles of Fukushima, there isn't any actual injury from radiation from the plant.
2016-12-17 05:27:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about????
2007-02-16 08:05:59 · answer #3 · answered by Baby Girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im sorry, could you say that again?
2007-02-16 08:00:04 · answer #4 · answered by pugsaleena 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋