In your opinion, did the NEW DEAL give too much power to the federal goverment? why or why not ?

Question

thanks for answering

Answer 1

Well, if you go back to the constitution, the powers granted the government are laid out there. All other powers not specifically mentioned in the Constitution were left to the states. Therefore, many things were probably already crossing the line by the time of the new deal and it certainly accelerated it. It is hard to argue that the government can and/or should provide safety nets. However, most safety nets generally evolve into entitilements.

Answer 2

Yes it did. "A program for every problem" was a miserable failure, and the curtailment of FDR's ways of doing things did not go far enough.

I remember this chapter of American history in one of my high school social studies classes, and I did not completely understand what was wrong with the New Deal until I became a truck driver.

I had always thought that trucker's logbooks were a "black box" on paper, used to study the causes of accidents. That, if true, would have been an intelligent thing to institute back in the 30's.

Unfortunately, the government decided from the beginning that they knew how to create a gigantic heap of regulations without studying anything. Today, all of those states which seem to be most politically in-line with the New Deal have turned the Hours-of-Service Regs (created supposedly to help the drivers) into a complete extortion racket, getting into the drivers' pockets. It revealed the true hypocrisy of leftism to me for all the rest of time. When government wants to do you a favor, watch your back and keep your hand on your wallet.

Answer 3

Too much Rush Limbaugh is my diagnosis. It's one thing do discuss the subject of just what the Federal Government's role is in governance, and along the same lines we could discuss what areas the federal government might be intrusive into the rights of the states and their citizens, but narrowing the focus to the New Deal as a package sounds like a bullet point right out of a CATO Institute presentation, and it's not narrow or specific enough (e.g. farm subsidies, let's look at those, etc) to avoid looking like a smokescreen for a poorly disguised attempt to undermine Social Security (like enough of that hasn't been done in the last 6 years due to poor fiscal management of the Federal Budget mostly in regard to things totally outiside of any programs created by the New Deal that are still active).

Have a nice day.

Answer 4

that is likewise exciting to demonstrate screen the note utilization: "...after a chain of economic corporation mess united statesin 1907 confident Congress that the U. S. needed a significant monetary corporation to substantiate the well being of the country’s banking gadget." with out replacing the genuine content cloth of the passage (not even dealing with the allegation that in hardship-free words 3 contributors of Congress were in touch), the passage ought to were rewritten: "contributors of Congress used a chain of economic corporation mess united statesin 1907 as justification for organising a significant monetary corporation, arguing that that is critical to substantiate the well being of the country's banking gadget." Do you spot the form? As written, it leaves as a forgone end that organising a significant monetary corporation grow to be, in reality, needed to save the gadget healthful. there is not any questioning of that premise. As rewritten, that is way better purpose. an extremely purpose author ought to then have pronounced different pursuits that ought to have inspired the formation of the numerous monetary corporation. From there, i'd not blame him if he then opined on the numerous justifications, making as sparkling as available the position reality and opinion end. little question, the unfairness presented in this passage grow to be unintended. it should be puzzling for even the most conscientious historian to steer away from pre-conceived biases. we decide on to imagine of historic past as being some purpose, "purely the data, please" corporation. in reality, that is crammed with all sorts of unquestioned premises and bias.