2007-02-08 06:54:40 · 10 answers · asked by catchup 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Don't you remember when Osama came out pulling for Kerry? It was really a great help I think to the '04 election. He offered to give the states that went blue immunity from terrorist attacks. It was really rather counterproductive to his cause. I think if there were anyone's support I wouldn't want as a politician, it would be that of one of the world's most infamous terrorists.
2007-02-16 02:51:01 · answer #1 · answered by rumezzo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all the Bush Family and the Bin Ladin famiily are the ones linked through Oil and Construction contracts.
Thank you for perpetuating a dishonest warped mudslinging political campaign strategy. good for you puppet boy.
If the average working class Middle-Eastern family looks at both sides politics positions and track records and pulls for a democrat to come in and start using his words like a big boy insead of using the military like a medevil pompous asstronaut that he cannot lead, only make vague and dangerous demands of - then I say me and that average peaceful working class middle-eastern muslim have something in common.
These posters who are like "yea because the democrats are soft on terrorism" are advertising their ignorance. You guys are the mirror image of ***-backward intolerant militant members of hezbollah and you refuse to see it.
Listen - if you are old and set in your ways - and theres a whole lot about the media, technology, music, culture, conversation, that you just don't understand - what the heck makes you think you are informed on geo-political conflicts between western civilization and the middle east????
By osmosis?
Magic?
I can't use a VCR but there is no way I could be the stupid one regarding politics....sigh................
To recap - the actual terrorists want the party which validates their existance, assists them in recruitment, moves a higher volume of arms behind the scenes and can be bought with the right contracts by the right billionaire family (see Bush + Fahd).
The one that while in power has provided the actual terrorists the most publicity.
The average working family trying to survive in the Middle-East that some people carelessly group with terrorists support the party that promotes diplomacy, peace and engineering. The one that identifies terrorist cells by their actual names and differentiates between their seperate agendas. The one who views terrorist attacks as acts of violent crimes to be investigated and brought to justice - not an act of war that constitutes overthrowing one regime and installing a new one.
Please get on the pro-human agenda!!!
2007-02-16 05:17:12 · answer #2 · answered by Nicholas J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't mean to be unkind but I believe that this question is based on a false premise. Do you remember George's "Axis of Evil" now what on Earth have the Shiite Mullahs of Iran in common with the Communists of the PRK or the Sunni El Quaida or Hezbollah?
This was another silly "Bush-ism".
Now consider the question posed. What Party would THE terrorists want to win.
It stands to reason that some will want one and some will want the other.
Isn't that obvious?
2007-02-14 23:56:38 · answer #3 · answered by salubrious 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blueridge be funny!!!
It's been well reported on the pro al Qaeda network, al Jazeera, that the terrorists want Democrats in control since they are soft in the backbone department.
2007-02-15 10:59:42 · answer #4 · answered by crusty old fart 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Definitely the wacky Democrats would be the preferred party of power for terrorists. If you think about it, Democrats want the terrorists to win so that Bush looks bad. Disgraceful.
2007-02-08 07:43:14 · answer #5 · answered by politicsforthefuture 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
LoL...blueridgeliving support your answer.
However, the terrorists do want Democrats to gain power.
I chose links outside the US sphere to avoid bias accusations...
2007-02-08 07:24:01 · answer #6 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Please like they have any say so in the election but wait maybe Bush is in and yes the wars started as soon as the fool got in so you tell me!
2007-02-13 01:58:29 · answer #7 · answered by sally sue 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Old news.
Al Queda came out long ago in support of bush.
2007-02-08 07:06:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Democrat without a shred of doubt.
2007-02-08 08:16:59 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
which ever party will tell the americans to get OUT OF THEIR LAND.
2007-02-08 17:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by wedjb 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋