This guy Hilltopper is another point gamer. Notice that it's not a yes or no question.
Any way, no, when a player is suspended, it is without pay. True, you'd think that not playing would be enough to upset a player and keep him on the straight and narrow, however, there's no guarantee. Therefore, you've got to hit them where it hurts...the pocket book. Players are not paid during a suspension unless otherwise specified. There have been coaches paid during suspensions in college football, however, they will specify that by calling it "Suspension with pay."
2007-02-08 08:48:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ray Michael 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The best way to answer your question is to take a look at a real life example. Melky Cabrera was suspended last season for 50 games due to a PED violation. His contract called for him to make $6 million for 2012. Cabrera's paycheck was reduced by 50/162 (games suspended divided by games in the season. In other words, his infraction cost Melky approximately $1.85 million. That's how much the Giants didn't have to pay him.
2016-03-28 22:26:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are not supposed to get paid,but no one knows what the owner and player have agree too behind closed doors,many owners will do anything to keep the player happy,even brake their own team rules
2007-02-08 07:00:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm pretty sure they don't get paid because they violated the league's drug policy and I'm pretty sure that policy is suspended without pay
2007-02-08 07:12:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by bad_dog76 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, hence the name suspended with-out pay.
2007-02-08 06:56:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Without pay
2007-02-08 07:16:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chad K 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
they don't get paid
2007-02-08 07:19:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Willy W 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
2007-02-08 08:41:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋