English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is your opinion of him? Guilty or not guilty? Should he be tried again or is double jeapody in effect?

2007-02-08 06:50:40 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Reduction to E-1
Forfiture of all Pay and Allowances
Confinement for five years
Dishonorable Discharge

It's what he deserves.

2007-02-08 06:54:17 · answer #1 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 1 1

Double jeopardy does not apply when there is a mistrial. If he had been acquitted he could not be tried again for the same offense in civilian courts. That may not apply to military courts. It isn't up to me to have an opinion about his guilt or innocence. That's a matter of military law, not civilian opinion.

2007-02-08 06:54:08 · answer #2 · answered by MOM KNOWS EVERYTHING 7 · 0 0

It's definitely double jeapardy. The trial was a mistrial granted by the judge. The government evidence against Watada is very weak and they are stumbling all over themselves when trying to present it. Watada is a hero for standing up to the illegality of this war. I agree with the other poster, if it is a volunteer military, he should be able to opt out if fighting in a particular war is against moral and ethical standards of human relations. I mean, Watada is right, Iraq didn't attack us. Do you realize that every one of our soldiers could be tried according to the Geneva convention and the Nuremburg trial precedent of crimes against humanity? Bush and Cheney are being investigated right now for that very same thing over in Germany. Watada has a strong case in this argument as well.

2007-02-08 07:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Watada confirmed that he's an officer and an American via status up for what he believed in. He set an occasion well worth following to all people who needs to declare citizenship, opposite to those that do no longer choose to artwork for it. He would not have been tried interior the 1st place. He asked yet another task because of the fact he's adversarial to an unlawful conflict. His "chain of command" did no longer choose him putting an occasion for his adult adult males as the thank you to protest deployment to Iraq, so as that they refused. whilst he then refused to place in, they tried to apply him to set an occasion for all people else who could evaluate the variety of protest. They lost, and Watada has succeeded in proving that even nonetheless the outcomes could be serioius or severe, status up on your rights and ideology is something this is honorable and worth to comprehend.

2016-11-02 21:59:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Let him go . Its a volunteer army .Say see ya and be done with him . Whats up with forcing people to got to war if they do not want to .
If you can not even get the military to fight Bush's battles then who can we get . plenty of people have lied and said they would do things and then ignored their oath . Like Bush who took the presidential oath and has done everything he could to get around the constitution . Lets just ask the soldiers if they want out and be done with it . Then we will have the army we need to fight terrorists .

2007-02-08 06:56:32 · answer #5 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers