I have a son in elementary school and am beginning to wonder about the efficacy of the school district's choice in pedagogical methods in math.
My son came home last fall with a text called "Every Day Math" and I believe that the methods presented in the book are deleterious to his future welfare as a critical thinker. The book espouses the use of calculators to solve general problems that literally take me less time to do in my head than to punch the correct buttons on a calculator.
What is your experience with this method and do you have any issues presented therein? I would also like to hear if you find their methods to be an improvement over standard mathematics.
2007-02-08
06:47:09
·
4 answers
·
asked by
mjatthebeeb
3
in
Education & Reference
➔ Teaching
Quote:"For example, students experiment with adding 10 to different numbers, fill out a chart with their results, and generate a rule based on their findings. This is the heart of critical thinking--examples to idea." - Snowberry
2007-02-09
09:28:53 ·
update #1
With all due respect to Snowberry, I don't believe that "examples to an idea" is really at the heart of critical thinking. In my opinion, at an early age, the use of a tool to overcome work is only advisable when the mechanics of the work to be overcome is understood past the point of declarative knowledge.
It seems that the true path to demonstrative knowledge lies closer to the "low road" of self-administered deliberation. To say that the calculator is only a means to an end further devalues the problem solving process. For a child, it's as if the old cartoon depicting Einstein at the board writing the words "And then a miracle occurs..." rings true each time the "equals" button is depressed.
2007-02-09
09:36:32 ·
update #2