2007-02-08 06:41:54 · 6 answers · asked by jarynth3 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I have heard some argue that behavior modification is too utilitarian, meaning that the concern is only on outcomes, not feelings and thoughts.
If there is a deeper reason for maladjusted behavior, and all we do is apply a behavior modification, then definately I would say that Behavior modification is a band aid approach. It does not treat the underlying problem.
On the other hand, if there are no underlying problems, then go ahead and apply a behavior modification program. And if the behavior is harming the person, then quick remedies are needed; behavior modification can help. We can focus on the inner person once we get the harmful behavior under control.
Also, let's also not forget that without behavior modification, we would not have police dogs, animals doing fun tricks, and eye-seeing dogs for those with poor vision. Those who always criticize behavior modification often try to throw out the baby with the bath water.
2007-02-08 06:56:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dave 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the person is unhappy at the way they can't handle life, then behavoir modification is great for them because it's helping them cope with life the way they want to. I have to admit, being ADHD is awesome, I love being creative, but sometimes I don't realize I hurt people and I would like to be aware of those things.
2007-02-08 14:59:07 · answer #2 · answered by bryant s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. What I would like to know is where the line should be drawn, in relation to what can be considered to be 'bad' behaviour?
Criminal activity? Mental illness? Political or religious persuasion? Race / Ethnicity? Income/ Social status?
Where does the cutoff point come? Who makes the decision to 'protect' us from 'the riff-raff', the 'undesirables'?
And who protects those who are left from the protectors?
Brave new world 'technologies' belong in a brave new world. This one ain't either.
2007-02-14 01:24:42 · answer #3 · answered by busted.mike 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I hate the idea that behaviorists want to put Responsive Neurotransmitter (RNS) chips inside people's heads because metal illness is just so "inelegant".
2007-02-08 14:47:16 · answer #4 · answered by Jen of Eve 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No...but I think you would do well with a little EST (Electro Shock Therapy!!!).."vain epitome"???? come on!
2007-02-08 14:50:46 · answer #5 · answered by Toots 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Think Pavlov and the answer is yes.
2007-02-16 14:33:19 · answer #6 · answered by peternaarstig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋