Because starting an illegal war that results in the deaths of lots of innocent civillians is ok.
BUT
Two adults having a consensual sexual relationship. BAD! EVIL! PERSECUTE!
2007-02-08 06:32:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cardinal Fang 5
·
5⤊
5⤋
I guess we're just blinded by the previous administration integrity problems. Talk about serious problems, how about the sour taste America got with the Clinton's last week in office.
How about all those pardons for payoffs to the library, for Hilary's NY Puerto Rican vote and other considerations.
2007-02-08 14:42:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sgt 524 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'll put it into language you can understand...first of all most of the stuff you read about Bush is falsehoods, based on fault information, personal bias, or Liberal Propaganda...Bush has not committed a crime, so he is not wrong...let's put your Clinton's "Personal Life" remark into context...are you allowed to have sexual relations on your job? If you do would you be fired? If you were caught and then lied about it, what would your employer do? Clinton was not impeached because he had sexual relations, but because he lied to a Grand Jury under oath about it, which in any state in the US is a crime...what would happen if you or I lied to a Grand Jury...we would be in jail...the problem with your argument is that you over simplify what Clinton did...I see this all the times with Clinton supports...if you remember correctly, the Liberal Media was all up in arms about Clinton's impeachment, because he was their boy...the fact is Clinton was to busy playing hide the cigar or having phone sex with a fat intern and then defending himself to effectively run our country...unfortunately for him you can not run the country by opinion and popularity polls, that is why I like Bush, he has testicles, he is not swayed by the opinion of the Liberal minority...if Clinton had been this way, Bin Laden would be dead and 9/11 would not have happened...I hope I explained this on your level better....
2007-02-08 14:44:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is only the conservative Republicans that are obsessing on Clinton's personal life. I personally couldn't give a rats a** about Bills personal life.
2007-02-08 14:37:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by T S 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
If we want to talk about personal lives, let's get real and talk about Guliani marrying his cousin and kicking his family out of the mayor's mansion so his mistress could move in.
2007-02-08 14:49:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
because their new slogan is “Lies And Videotape But No Sex”,,hence the voyeuristic desire to peer into anyone (in this case Clinton) who has a sex life,,wonder how many Cons got off hearing about Clinton’s sexcapades in the Oval office,,
2007-02-08 14:36:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by JS 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
It is bothersome isn't it? Even beyond the Clinton stuff - we are wanting to be deeper in the know about Brad / Angelina , Tom/Katie, etc. than the system that touches us closer day to day. I'm with you.
2007-02-08 14:34:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by wonderful1 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
One more time.
It wasn't about his personnal life.
When you start sexually harressing women. Than smearing their names. Lie under oath to cover up his pratices.
It now becomes public.
Or do you believe a man can use his powers of office to prevent women from having their day in court.
That it is OK for men to sexual harress women as long as they are Pro-Choice.
Women's rights don't matter to you than.
As far as Bush goes their lots of claims but nothing that holds up in the light of reality.
2007-02-08 14:34:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
All candidates personal lives are reflective of what they would do as an elected official...would they do the same in their public actions?
2007-02-08 14:34:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stormchaser 5
·
5⤊
3⤋
What the heck? Are you serious? That is all i see on TV. ALL I SEE.
2007-02-08 14:49:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Captain Planet 2
·
1⤊
2⤋