2007-02-08 06:19:25 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bush------not even close
Lets see Clinton Cheated on his wife, and ignored threats from the Taliban on American lives
Bush did what is necessary to keep americans safe (phone tapping) even if it pissed off a couple liberals
2007-02-08 07:25:26 · answer #1 · answered by Angus 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sunset Sam has a short memory. Clinton had the whole scandal of why personal information files on his enemies disappeared from the FBI and then magically were found in the Whitehouse. Every modern president has had a hand in spying on people and it is foolish to target the Bush wiretaps while forgetting Clinton's filegate. At least Bush claimed that he was doing it out of a concern for national security. Clinton never did explain why or how he wound up with files of his critics.
2007-02-08 06:31:58 · answer #2 · answered by Senor Pig 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
The answer here greatly depends on your own personal version of morality. It is (in my estimation) the nature of a politician to fabricate the truth to get as many votes as possible. Liberal or Conservative. Both Bush and Clinton lied to the American public.
I guess the real question here is, by your moral standards is it better to lie about infidelity or about the reasons for us to take the lives of thousands of people.
You decide
2007-02-08 06:51:33 · answer #3 · answered by Wojo2112 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush
2007-02-08 06:22:20 · answer #4 · answered by Allan B 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Bush- Highly moral.
Clinton- completely immoral.
Bush by lightyears.
2007-02-08 08:21:12 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton. His actions involved consentual adults, and did no harm to anyone outside his immediate family. Adultery can hardly be compared to manipulating intelligence and inventing links to 9-11 to justify the invasion of another nation, and the death of a hundred thousand or so innocent civilians, for political gain.
2007-02-08 06:36:38 · answer #6 · answered by kena2mi 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush
2007-02-08 06:21:52 · answer #7 · answered by slo1970 3 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Bush..
2007-02-08 06:42:39 · answer #8 · answered by bereal1 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
without a doubt BUSH
2007-02-08 07:55:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say Bush. Especially towards his family. He took this job to defend the country, not to get bj's in the oval office.
2007-02-08 06:44:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋