I know Jefferson wanted us to have "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", but we kinda destroyed that when we are murdering our children in the womb.
I know we had the Roe v Wade travesty, but where did they get their basis for that?
Where does it say "it is OK to kill your child, as long as it isn't very big"? Just curious.
2007-02-08 05:58:22 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
They got it from the fact that Liberals controlled the Supreme Court at the time.
That's why they were all in a tizzy over Bush placing two conservatives on the court.
I think it's under the amendment known as the "Right to not deal with the consequences of our mistakes"
Interestingly enough, that same amendment is where we see the right to welfare and affirmative action....
2007-02-08 06:06:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
First, regarding Roe v. Wade, do some damn research.
Second, get a life!
Third, figure out why the gods don't just drop a rock on your head.
2007-02-08 20:01:43 · answer #2 · answered by bai.mingsheng 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being born is just one of a series of events in the life of a person. It's not the start of life, which occurs a lot earlier. It is just the beginning of a form of independence. Killing someone is bad independently of whether they have been born or not.
2007-02-08 14:11:25 · answer #3 · answered by Always Hopeful 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Where does it say that another person has the right to force a pregnancy on an unwilling female?! Child abuse would skyrocket and back room abortions would flourish. Get your head out of your asterisk and realize that legislating the right to reproduce would cost as many lives in crueler deaths as it does at this moment.
Why not make birth control cheaper and more reliable? or does that offend you too. If so, are you willing to take in and pay for the care of all the unwanted children?
2007-02-08 14:09:00 · answer #4 · answered by Lorrie C 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
In some screwy way it was determined that what a woman does with her body is part of her right to privacy(which actually isn't a right in the constitution, but I digress). It helps to make the leap that a child isn't a child until it is born.
2007-02-08 14:03:18 · answer #5 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He gave you the right to use condoms and masturbate and kill all those little babies, when you flush them down the stool , no different. That is your choice just like abortion is a woman's right
to choose.
2007-02-08 14:07:23 · answer #6 · answered by Nicki 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Research "stare decisis"
2007-02-08 14:07:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is stupid to think that just because of an inconvenient pregnancy you shouldn't murder an innocent child because of it. not to mention
no one should be having sex until they are married.
2007-02-08 14:08:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Murder is never a right.
2007-02-08 14:06:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋