English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Good one!

2007-02-08 05:35:50 · answer #1 · answered by kissybertha 6 · 0 0

Better yet. Be even more politically correct. How about the United Royal Persondom ?

2007-02-08 13:36:16 · answer #2 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

Good question,however I don't know. Well I live in the U.S. and have often wondered why we don't have the state of Mistersippi, since we have a state of missisippi.

2007-02-08 13:39:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who would want to change all the stationary? And the monuments with "U.K." on them?

At least H.R.H. works for both kings and queens.

2007-02-08 15:27:32 · answer #4 · answered by morningfoxnorth 6 · 0 0

In the Unites Sates they refer to it as a presidency. Isn't it more correct to be called an idiocy?

2007-02-08 15:06:17 · answer #5 · answered by albatros39a 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers