2007-02-08
04:06:25
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
and why u think that?!!! if terrorist kill inocent people so do he?!!
2007-02-08
04:07:40 ·
update #1
TO jnwmom dont worry I am not in your country... george bush bombedentire Iraq to get saddam hussain and the weapons he did catsh saddam but where is the weapons and that is not an excuse to kill inocent people
2007-02-08
04:18:19 ·
update #2
TO jnwmom dont worry I am not in your country... george bush bombedentire Iraq to get saddam hussain and the weapons he did catsh saddam but where is the weapons and that is not an excuse to kill innocent people
2007-02-08
04:18:55 ·
update #3
babel babel gubity gubity bah bah American black sheep have you any wool yes sir yes sir three bags full.
People think Bush party are human got another thing to chew on. They're not human ! They're reptillian ! Read David Icke books & get some truth on the matter !
I know there are no such thing as terrorists. Not a one. Sorry to disappoint you "Repuppies".
There are scared children all over Afghanistan. They have been refugees there since 2003 or before. Only helping drive people out doesn't appear to be sending any children or families returned to Iraq with a bag of & a water purification machine set up there by the government like they should to be.
Sane "good will" has been given the axe.
So yeah the Whole Bush Party & thousands of republican senators are sure acting the same as terrorists !
He calls himself the decider.
"The People" are the decider's in the constitution !
2007-02-08 08:22:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dane Aqua 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
the terrorists dont have a government or uniforms.they do not have the right to their own national wealth.they do not have PR.they dont have democracy.why?because the americans interfere for the benefit of american interests.they impose leaders on to these nations.it is only natural for there to be a revolt against this.there will be protests and violence in varying degrees.
The question to ask is ;
if Iraq was the superpower today,and had its hollywood/powerful media to impose its values and culture.
if usa had oil which iraqi companies wanted to control so iraqi citizens could live in luxury.
if the jews said that america was holyland and the iraqis backed the jewish claims by helping them seize land and homes from natives.
if the iraqis decided to split america up into smaller countries withe leaders imposed and no democracy
WOULD THERE be any american terrorists
2007-02-08 12:51:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by bbarr12 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
what is your problem... do you know anything that is going on... do you know what has been happening over there for the past 25 plus year.... there has been terrorists killing there own for years, fighting over land...... we are trying to help.... its funny that most supported the war when it first started but now that people are dying(which happens when you go to war) it was a bad decision..... make up your mind and stay with it.... bush is great because with all the criticism and back stabbing he still sticks to what he know is right.... all the democrats voted for the war in the beginning but know that its getting around to election year they start saying how we should pull out so all the mindless zombies of Americans we have became will vote for them...... if you dont like our government and what it stand for leave go some where else.... your a joke and think for yourself not what the news tells you.....
2007-02-08 12:25:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mrteabaggens 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
If you look at it logically and leave out the emotion, not much
Terrorists operate under the premise of pre-emption, get them before they get us and if we scare the bejesus out of people along the way then so be it. You have slighted them in some way so they will get back at you. Saudi Arabia considered the holiest of holies by Muslims, occupied by the so called infidels' army from 1991. This was considered an affront and based on the corruption of the Saudi royal family and the oppression of the people there, it was seen as the influence of the infidel west. The west will continue to spread their beliefs and based on what was seen in SA not wanted. So strike back
George Bush operates under the premise of pre-emption, get them before they get us and if we scare the "enemy" along the way, good for us. We were attacked, so attack a country that did not attack us based on some obscure belief that they would attack us- Iraq. We send in an army, there is what they like to call " collateral damage" a nice way of saying they killed innocent people. To boost our army ranks, we have lowered standards, admitting known criminals into the ranks who have gone on to commit crimes such as the case with the soldier under arrest for raping and killing the 14 year old Iraqi girl and the slaughter of her entire family. This has now besmirched the good the rest of the armed forces are trying to do and possibly helped to create other terrorists with that one disgusting act
Not much difference at all.
2007-02-08 12:19:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
6⤊
5⤋
It's pretty simple. George Bush is the predator, the terrorists are they prey. And if terrorists would stop hiding amongst the civilian population like decent people, we wouldn't have all the civilian casualties.
2007-02-08 12:10:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
3⤋
ummm.. because he's not a terrorist. that's the most ignorant question i've seen on here. the difference is, bush doesn't kill innocent people on purpose.... terrorists do. sometimes i think people have permanent tunnel vision. open your eyes and look around!!!
p.s. sky.... the american intelligence agency was not the only agency that said he had WMD's. everyone thought he did. and truthfully.. he DID. they just weren't there when we got there apparently. doesn't it matter to you that we took out a murderous tyrant, broke up terrorist cells, ETC ETC.
2007-02-08 12:16:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by jasonsluck13 6
·
7⤊
3⤋
the terrorists kill people and think by doing so, they will go to heaven and be in paradise! bush is at least more careful and has some regards for human rights! that is difference! even though this is the worst president we have ever had, and has completely bungled the job in iraq! with thousands of our trrops getting killed for nothing! i feel sorry for the next president who has to clean up after the mess george bush created! he did not even get osma bin laden! that man is still laughing at us, and planning another w orldwide attack on americans and i guarantee it will happen, but after bush is nice and safe with laura in their retirement! how pathetic! this nation needs to wake up with our next selection as president!
2007-02-08 12:14:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
Stultorum quanto status sublimior, tanto manifestior turpitudo.
2007-02-08 12:58:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush bathes daily. Bush is a decent guy. Terrorist smell bad. Terrorists are murders.
2007-02-08 12:17:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Damn Good Dawg 3
·
5⤊
5⤋
I have to agree with Rob d.
2007-02-08 12:24:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by slabsidebass 5
·
2⤊
0⤋