NO. Remove the name Clinton just as the DNC is going to do because they really can't afford to lose.
2007-02-08 04:16:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I detest Obama. He is the biggest liar and hypocrite in America with his moderate speeches and ultra liberal voting record. He can't win anywhere in the South whereas a Clinton, Edwards ticket could put the Democrats back in the White House. I wonder though if a Clinton/Bayh or Clinton/Richardson would be more effective by bringing middle of the road voters back because it looks as though the Republicans will run either moderate Giuliani or moderate McCain.
2007-02-08 05:07:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An Obama / Edwards ticket
2007-02-08 08:57:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I prefer Edwards on the ticket....but not Clinton and Obama
I actually want the Democrats to win and having a woman or a black guy on the ticket is a sure fire way to throw in the towel
Im not racist...just realistic....the country is not ready for a woman in office or a minority
Lets stick to the safe white guy and get a win....its going to be hard enough going up against Giuliani
2007-02-08 04:10:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Huh? 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
A ticket without Clinton... I have no problem with a female president. But I have a huge problem with Hilary Clinton. Find someone else. If the democrats put her on the ticket, they lose my vote.
2007-02-08 04:09:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Uncle Tim 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
None of the above - I don't want Hillary AT ALL! She's a socialist that tries to claim she's a moderate. She will also say anything to get someone to vote for her.
Obama is too inexperienced. There shouldn't be a huge learning curve when someone is president. Edward is too liberal too.
Have you read all the New Yorkers on Yahoo that say she's a "do nothing Senator." If they don't like her, and they are familiar with her, why should we?
2007-02-08 04:10:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dizney 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Obama Edwards is the most electable. i do not imagine Edwards can get the nomination yet when he were Veep it makes a especially good mix for the final election. Hilary's were given some significant negatives interior the final if she receives the nom...
2016-11-26 02:46:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Edwards Pres. Obama VP
2007-02-08 04:13:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Neither. What I'd really like to see is Feingold/Obama. Russ Feingold is one of the few politicians with a clear vision and enough backbone to follow through. Unlike the rest of the spineless pack, a group of cliche-regurgitating clowns, Senator Feingold not only talks the talk; he walks the walk. It's about time Americans woke up and elected a president with integrity and balls.
2007-02-08 04:16:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
please do not disturb the liberal socialists today.
they are all in a meeting of the "Neville Chamberlain Society"
for presentation of the "Jane Fonda Award for Acts of Treason
or Anti-American Rhetoric".
the nominated indiviuals this year include:
John Mirtha
Jane Fonda
Barbara Steisand
Harry Reid
Hillary Clinton
Ted kennedy
Chuck Shumer
Jimmy Carter
Carl Levin
and a few others.
2007-02-08 05:34:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chef Bob 5
·
0⤊
0⤋