English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

More precisely, does the ontology come with an ethics? How can this ethics be described? (All answers will be purely subjective, I know.)

2007-02-08 03:56:10 · 6 answers · asked by jarynth2 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

6 answers

Its all about me.

2007-02-08 04:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Since solopsism basically says that only you truly exist, there solopsism is selfish.
Ethics are generally perceived as a set of societal standards that encompass the norms of the community.
There are ethics in all studies, but, ethics particular to ontology are epistemological (knowing the self) and metaphysical(knowing the way one validates truth against the environment)...which makes them more complete, more complex and therefor more personal than societal.

2007-02-08 12:22:25 · answer #2 · answered by aidan402 6 · 0 0

Solipsism as a philosophy isn't about selfishness. My ethical slant:
What you think about others is really what you are yourself.
(If I identify and change in myself what I don't like in others, voila, no further dislike of anyone.)
The 5 causes of my suffering are my lies, stealing, abuse, betrayal and denial. When I stop doing these absolutely, nobody else will be able to do them to me and I will no longer suffer.
Since I spent 10 years unsuccesssfully trying to disprove these statements, I had to finally accept they were true.

2007-02-13 03:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Solipsism is the essential motor of every single solely self-felt more or less fiercy individual form of life.

Here the self itself is aware of the fact that the self itself, as a self-singled-out self, is aware of solely being its own "elan vital" and the more or less fiercy more or less lucky determiner of its own teleology.

While the self itself - which I recognize as a partially blunt nano-something in a transition of which it, the self itself, doesn't really know much about - may acknowledge that anything else may be bluntly true outside the self's own self, and that the self itself may be aware of some of the qualitative and quantitative truth of all other experience than self's own experience, and so strategically ethically recognize anything else's layout as also being constructed with a somewhat comparable ontology and potentialities, still it is the self itself that bluntly views itself as essentially solely aware of its own primeval and final essential and fiercy more or less lucky drive towards preminence.

So, it is all this that fiercely colors the self's essential sense of own sole self-authority and the self's essential sense of its own more or less fiercy more or less lucky self-survival into the huge glow of blazing bright infinity.

2007-02-16 05:46:50 · answer #4 · answered by pasquale garonfolo 7 · 0 0

the person is best said to be amoral.he follows his own thoughts as he believes them to be the only thoughts that exist

2007-02-08 12:11:03 · answer #5 · answered by henryredwons 4 · 0 0

Leave me alone, please !

2007-02-08 19:50:56 · answer #6 · answered by Andrew Noselli 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers