1. Nancy pelosi refused to impeach President George W. Bush.
2007-02-08 03:39:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ralph Nader is great. The Green Party is great.
Republicans and Democrats are both corrupt corporate whores who have sold their soul to remain in power.
2007-02-08 03:50:23 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
the reason I and many different Democrats carry Nader in such contempt is because if it weren't for him Gore ought to been elected in 2000. Our part lost Fla via 500 votes. Nader were given 50,00 in Fla. So all the bs: Iraq, Afghanistan, freely giving the surplus, subprime lending, recession etc should be laid at Nader's footsteps. Nader knew this grow to be going to be an in intensity election. in reality the information-media grow to be putting forward it grow to be too on the fringe of call for WEEKS before it occurred. Nader knew this. yet Nader also knew he had adequate votes to swing the election if it were close. Why did not he make a cope with Gore about shopper Affairs or the ambience extremely of observing him lose to Bush. With Bush our part lost each thing yet with Gore a minimum of we get something. it type of appears like a no brainer to me. yet NO Nader insisted on being contained in the race till the very end. he's an conceited fool. And so are the individuals who voted for him. in case you opt on to understand how obdurate Nader is watch "an unreasonable guy" Its on DVD and that i understand its on Netflix. His lack of ability to compromise convey about tens of millions of people being harm. he's a traitor and that i'm hoping he rots in Hell.
2016-12-03 21:50:55 · answer #2 · answered by matis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nader is a liar. Most of his anti-business crusades are based on cheap lies.
As for Pelosi refusing to impeach Bush, the fact remains that Bush has not committed an impeachable crime. To rational people, that's considered a hindrance to bringing articles of impeachment against Bush.
2007-02-08 04:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
For the record, you can't impeach a President because you don't like him. Most people want him impeached for things they can never prove because it's propaganda. Nothing more, nothing less.
Nader would not appeal to most Americans. If you like him, you have every right in the world to vote for him (should he run again), but I think most Americans really care about charisma, looks, and flare. I'm convinced most Americans don't really follow Politics too well.
2007-02-08 03:45:25 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Info 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, i agree, Dems should look to Ralph Nader for answers.
2007-02-08 03:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Ralph Nader is a nutjob, no better than the Republicans.
2007-02-08 03:53:49 · answer #6 · answered by brian2412 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
All I can say these days is Bush Is the worst president ever .
2007-02-08 03:44:55 · answer #7 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather have that billionaire guy that ran against Clinton and Bush.
2007-02-08 03:43:11 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think that we should. The republicans want to keep us all stupid, fat and drunk. The democrats want us to be dependant on handouts. **** them both!!!!!
2007-02-08 04:01:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
for what? on what charge? I hate Bush, but stupidity isn't a criminal offense.
2007-02-08 03:47:26 · answer #10 · answered by Gary W 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋