As we have seen most of the decision are more destructive than constructive. Like sealing and demolition which has made thousand of people lose their bread and butter and turned few crore pati in a day. Thousands of crore worth rupees properties has been destroyed without giving a second thought. Thousand of people are resting in jails without their trials could start. Making Free all Accused in a particular case and again starting their trials. Banning a particular Area for construction work for years. Removing All Jhuggis Jhopris from the heart of Indian Capital Delhi in a chilled Winter for the sake of creating space for whom.
2007-02-08 03:27:48 · 6 answers · asked by Abid 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
This is a highly misunderstood and unjust perception about the role of judiciary in the country... First of all, I clarify that I have no relative working in the judiciary... nor am I a blind follower of any institutional interest.. I wish to clarify in case your noticeably wrong impressions could be corrected in the light of the facts which appear to have been overlooked...
Dear friend, your very first declaration under "details" is so sadly surprising "....more destructive than constructive."? Are you by any chance in sympathy with any terror outfit that sees evil motive in all institutional roles for justice? The fact is, most citizens are seeing hope in the judgements of the highest judicial forums, in the face of continued defiance of the governments in implementing its own laws - in letter and spirit - as well as in the spirit of the Constitution...
Sealing of unlawful commercial houses in residential areas - against the laws enacted by elected governments - was not by any extent of imagination "destructive"... The residents who were virtually choked by continued expansion and intrusion of commercial complexes in their midst - with the connivance of the officials who were bound to implement the laws restricting the extent of comercial area in such locality - were indeed finding themselves helpless - with the only option to sell out their spaces for whatever sum offered and move away to more peaceful locale... until the courts came to their rescue directing the officials to play their legitimate roles.. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COURT CAN NOT ORDER ANYTHING WHICH IS NOT IN LAW...
It is true that there were dislocations to the small business houses but that was brought upon themselves, not thrust on them... Consider someone encroaching on your backyard and shouting that they are facing "unjust eviction" when you move the court for justice!
The officials and politicians do not want to implement laws that were framed for the overall good of the community, because there is advantage in violating the restrictive provisions... the beneficiaries (businessmen in this case) are prepared to pay hefty bribe..
The aberrations like long gestation in trial stage and mass freeing of the accused mentioned by you are really the making of the corrupt police and public executives who have to produce proper evidences before the courts for timely and adequate punitive action on the accused... The courts try to do what they could... they pass strictures when there are weak - "made up" evidences -are inordinate delays in preparing charge sheets... How come you do not see the true side of everything, dear?
Your perversion - sorry, that is what it is: to see the wrong side of right things - is akin to the views of corrupt officials - there are of course some jewels among them trying to do justice to their job and get thrown out of the jurisdiction by greedy political masters. The judiciary is also human and can occassionally err, but still it is the only institution that holds hope for justice in the midst of unethical executives and greedy politicians, for serving the cause of the common citizens..
2007-02-08 16:54:26 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When more people more politics;
more political parties more confulsion
more Members of Parliament more confusion
more ministers more confusion
more money more confusion
more jobs less staff imperfection will prevail
imperfect reservation policy will result in imperfect Government
But India trying to go for perfection.
Let us hope that perfection prevails during the future.
2007-02-11 09:03:22 · answer #2 · answered by Indian wizard 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, they are attempting to legislate from the bench as well as re-write the original meaning of the Constitution.
2007-02-08 11:41:11 · answer #3 · answered by elmar66 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-08 11:35:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it appear like that, they should prove otherwise, and justify their actions.
2007-02-09 05:36:16 · answer #5 · answered by wizard of the East 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it is within limit
2007-02-11 08:44:09 · answer #6 · answered by srini r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋