Constitutionally, they are the same for all.
But it always falls short of the ideal when the human element is introduced. That's the nature of the beast.
2007-02-08 02:49:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the source of justice emanating from a point can be compared the source of heat from a common source.
Then the people receiving the effect of justice on them can be compared to the effect of the common heat source on a number of dissimilar materials - gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, earth, ice etc.
They are all affected differently due to their inherent characteristics & properties. Their resistance and sustainabilities are different.
2007-02-09 00:01:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in a justice system of injustice, the law is determined by the judge, if he is a liberal judge he will enact his determination of the law, not following the guidelines of the law that is printed. Some judges are ruling today based on feeling not justice. SELF INTERPRETATION!!!The District Attorney will plea bargain if there is a better chance of getting a favorable decision with out going to trial.
2007-02-08 10:56:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by froginafire 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because not everyone is "the same." Some people behave differently. Some people have different qualifications and different capabilities.
Why can't you ask a question that has a little bit more specificity to it? The answer I gave above is the only one I can give to a question that is so vague.
{edit} Um, ............................. gee, ........................... thanks for the clarification. Now I know EXACTLY what you're talking about!
2007-02-08 10:44:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because status, funding and entitlements are not the same for all.
2007-02-08 10:44:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamed 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is because all fingers are not the same!
2007-02-08 10:50:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sami V 7
·
0⤊
0⤋