I realize she has her constituency in Ca. , but now she's Speaker of the House of the United States of America !!! Third in line to the Presidency !!!
The Speaker needs to be close to Wash. D. C. with all the action going on these days .
Wouldn't it be more prudent that she make herself more available ?
Or, in case of national emergency, is everybody obligated to WAIT for a jet to fly CROSS-COUNTRY ? Wasting fuel and Unnecessarily ADDING to GLOBAL WARMING ?
2007-02-08 01:20:33 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I know about the snow in Texas, but I was being facetious in an attempt to pander to the Liberals OWN BELIEFS .
2007-02-08 01:27:36 · update #1
NOTE : To Meeee - All senators and congressmen are NOT the Speaker of the House .
2007-02-08 01:28:36 · update #2
You are 100% correct. I know we have had to re locate with every job we have taken. Instead of demanding a bigger jet, she should just move. It will make things much easier.
2007-02-08 02:19:06 · answer #1 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is much greater of a communist than Obama. She is decrease than the impression of alcohol on her own capability and would not care a area relating to the working human beings. i think of she might seem good in a coat of tar and feathers. yet we actually can not assume too lots of her. After her,she's from San Fagcisco
2016-12-17 05:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That makes no sense. Would we make ALL Senators and Congressional Representatives move to Washington because that's where they work?
Funny how we've never required a Speaker of the House to move out of the state they represent before. Why change the rules now? Because you don't like the fact that Democrats won control of both houses? Sounds pretty selfish to me. Besides - Bush hotfoots it across the country all the time in Air Force One, at a cost to taxpayers of $56,800 per hour. He flew from Washington to Delaware - it's a trip he could have been driven in an armored limo for far less than it cost us to fly him less than 200 miles. Where's your outrage at the expense and global warming issues there???
2007-02-08 01:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Its funny how the libs made a big deal when Hassert got his plane but you don't hear any of them complaining since she wants her bigger plane.Where is Al Gore?Shouldn't he be upset that she will be burning more fuel?
I think Nancy should more her doctor to D.C. so she wont have to travel to San Fran for her botox treatments..,John Kerry would appreciate that as well.
2007-02-08 01:33:54 · answer #4 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
It's not like she does much in DC anyway... I'd leave her in CA and let her conduct her business by phone/video. If she needs to fly, I think a Cub should be sufficient... LOL
2007-02-08 01:27:47 · answer #5 · answered by Amer-I-Can 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes... except that people have nothing to do with global warming... blame it on the huge ball of fire that comes up in the sky every morning...
and California to Texas covered in Snow... that's global warming alright.
2007-02-08 01:24:44 · answer #6 · answered by J-Rod on the Radio 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think it is time to move the government from the east coast to the central united states .Say Nebraska this way the travel distance is the same for both coasts and we can end the east coast west coast rivalry .
2007-02-08 01:30:34 · answer #7 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Nancy Pelosi should move to Iran
2007-02-08 01:26:45 · answer #8 · answered by 007 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think she just needs to get over it.
That C21 is not a bad aircraft and is all she needs.
2007-02-08 01:23:40 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No,she should stand up for her beliefs!
2007-02-08 03:36:48 · answer #10 · answered by MaryAnn K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋