If you were given the chance to choose before your birth between?

Question

living 100 years without too much money, or
living 50 years wealthy,
which would you choose?
(In both cases your health is guaranteed)

Answer 1

100 years because I don't live for money. I live for experience. Imagine me 100 years old and passing my life experiences to EVERYONE and inspiring them. This is the true purpose of living for me! :)

Answer 2

Wow that is the best question I have ever seen on this sight it gets a person to think and I would take 100 years hands down life is awesome with or without money there are so many things in life for free that are better than anything money could buy (and yes I do know were to shop)

Answer 3

living 50 years wealthy

Answer 4

living 50 years wealthy

Answer 5

I'd rather choose 100 years without too much money because I want a life cherished not by material wealth but something worth living surrounded and loved by family members. Money isn't everything for me.

Answer 6

live 50 years wealthy

Answer 7

50 years wealthy, I have no desire to live to be 100

Answer 8

live 50 years

Answer 9

A healthy 100 years without too much money sounds pretty good to me. You don't say poor, so i'd image its as i am now, not really wealthy and not really poor.

Answer 10

I surely have had Rosamund picked out because i became about 16. i'm 25 now and nevertheless plan on utilising. My BF (thank God!) loves it too, so if we ought to continuously ensue to have a lady collectively, she will be able to be Rosamund Adeline. i visit't imagine adjusting the call. perchance if someone significant in my existence died acceptable earlier the delivery i'd sense extra vulnerable to call the toddler after them?? Or if for some reason (i have heard of it happening), she in basic terms did not seem as if a Rosamund? I quite won't be able to imagine not utilising Rosamund.