2007-02-08 00:46:46 · 12 answers · asked by j p 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Sponsers
2007-02-08 00:48:34 · answer #1 · answered by Lew 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same concept, different businesses. Yes, it's a business - the owner organizes the pageant and sells the TV rights to cover costs and hopefully make a profit. The TV network in turn sells advertising time, hoping to make a profit. The advertisers - well, you know.
The girls compete hoping to get scholarships, cash and prizes, and name recognition. Some Miss Americas have gone on to acting careers, for example.
2007-02-08 08:51:38 · answer #2 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Miss America has a talent competition and Miss USA doesn't.
2007-02-08 09:41:21 · answer #3 · answered by pikachu is love. 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have only slept with a Miss America contestant!
2007-02-08 08:49:52 · answer #4 · answered by STEPHEN S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One is to compete for Miss Universe and the other is to compete for Miss World
2007-02-08 08:50:05 · answer #5 · answered by shakensunshine86 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
America- goes best with White Wine
USA- Goes best with Red
2007-02-08 08:49:05 · answer #6 · answered by J-Rod on the Radio 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not much a black wins every other year and the years they don't win it seems they are runner-up. No doubt this is setup from the word go. There will be a black or some other non-white win every other year. What a joke black women competing against whites in beauty. LMMFAOATM!
2007-02-08 08:51:02 · answer #7 · answered by Bessie H 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The spelling
2007-02-08 09:15:42 · answer #8 · answered by jebi92 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
2 different companies exploiting women for a profit.
2007-02-08 08:49:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't really think there is anything different between them except, of course, their names...
2007-02-16 02:14:18 · answer #10 · answered by Scarlet Moon 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋