i think there are too many Nuclear bombs in the world and it will
continue to gets worse
2007-02-08 00:34:04 · 5 answers · asked by kimht 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I think the U.N. should be the final arbiter, and just as how a government can bring a citizen to book, the U.N. should be able to bring any government, or its leader to book, no matter how powerful the country or its leader is.
2007-02-08 00:39:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anthony F 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
About the nuclear bombs, I do agree to it. They need to stop using those because if you have watched "The day after tomorrow" or "The inconvenient truth", it seems to start happening and that is one of the reasons. I heard recently that some countries are going to sink by 2020. Anyway, about the leaders of warring nations can be detained as criminal at UN request well...I agree and disagree. Why? Well, they could be criminals since they're kinda out of democracy and some actions are against mother nature. But at the other hand, sometimes we people, accuse the wrong people that's why they may be either innocently accused...or not.
2007-02-08 08:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by Kaka 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with nothing the UN does, get US out of the UN and get the UN out of US.
2007-02-08 08:42:58 · answer #3 · answered by 007 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes. any leader should be accountable for crimes against another country.
2007-02-08 08:42:00 · answer #4 · answered by b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds good to me.
2007-02-08 08:39:45 · answer #5 · answered by DEMMY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋