2007-02-08 00:32:54 · 11 answers · asked by wr13169 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think it's a shame our president will not think of it.
2007-02-08 00:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by DEMMY 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
For the guy who asked, "A military problem being studied by a bunch of diplomats and statesmen?"
What were George Bush's unique military qualifications when he decided to launch the invasion of Iraq? All that time spent 30 years ago in the Texas Air National Guard?
Please...
James Bakker and Lee Hamilton are undeniablly experts in international diplomacy and management of the armed forces. Their opinions should be considered and valued.
2007-02-08 00:43:48 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy B 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
More foxes in the chicken coop!
It was headed up by Bush sr's boys Baker and Hamilton, and though it was somewhat critical of Bush jr., it essentially said he has at least two more years to figure it out in Iraq. So, basically it was a trick to lull the public into two more years of the same lie. Sadly, it worked.
2007-02-08 00:39:35 · answer #3 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
More than what Bush thought of it. I doubt if he even read the thing.
Its his way or no way. He doesnt want any advice on the matter-he has all the answers.
Look throughout history. Whenever the leader of a country that is at war has carried that attitude they have failed and lost the war. Whenever the leader of a country ignores the advice of his Generals and other experts regarding how to wage a war and insists on doing it HIS way they are doomed.
2007-02-08 00:41:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
A military problem being studied by a bunch of diplomats and statesmen? Hum, maybe they should get a dozen or so Generals together and come up with a new diplomatic strategy. Same end result................
2007-02-08 00:37:43 · answer #5 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They negated their credibility when they brought partisan politics into their findings. They were supposed to report facts and base opinions on those facts. Instead each came with their own political agenda and found facts to support their beliefs. They wasted their time and - what's infinitely worse - our money.
2007-02-08 00:40:44 · answer #6 · answered by Tom Jr 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nothing more than a compromise between the far left and the far right.
Basically it is silly to think that a compromise with a party who's only agenda is to gain more power is ridiculous and would be irresponsible to follow.
2007-02-08 00:56:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it's a bunch of BS - put together by people who are pandering to Liberals and terrorists.
2007-02-08 00:53:04 · answer #8 · answered by Lily VonSchtupp 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Forget those partisan hacks
2007-02-08 01:12:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it appears to be a waste of money,since it was largely ignored
2007-02-08 00:39:08 · answer #10 · answered by b 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are some good points in it.
2007-02-08 00:47:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anthony F 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋